Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Do you disagree?

Yes. Nobody gets that percentage of anything, anywhere, anytime. Impossible. Not saying she didn't win. Just saying that 98% is fraud. Plain and simple.

31 posted on 11/10/2010 3:44:19 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: johniegrad

how many ballots are misspelled?


32 posted on 11/10/2010 3:46:59 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: johniegrad

Not trying to be argumentative...

My reasoning is this. The other two main candidates were on the ballot. There were a lot of other names qualified as write-ins, but I think they were mainly there to add to the confusion. None of them other than Murky was projected to draw much support.

If a few of them got a few thousand votes, it would still be very easy for Murky to get the vast majority of the write-ins.

I agree that on a normal ballot, all names being listed, it would be impossible for someone to get 98% of the vote. But if we’re isolating this to just the write-ins, it could be very reasonable for a candidate to get almost every write-in vote, comparatively.

Maybe you or someone else can chime in and explain why I’m wrong. I might agree with you or them. At this point, I just don’t understand why you don’t think a popular write-in couldn’t get most of the write-ins.


53 posted on 11/10/2010 4:18:45 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Your next chance like this? About 2044. Vote popularity and don't waste time with the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson