Skip to comments.
Teen can't sue school for sex molestation
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 11/10/10
| Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
Posted on 11/10/2010 12:27:48 PM PST by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
11/10/2010 12:27:53 PM PST
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
No accountability for any government hack. They get a free ride to molest you children.
Does the law cover priests as well?
2
posted on
11/10/2010 12:29:09 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Today, we start fixing stupid.)
To: SmithL
3
posted on
11/10/2010 12:29:35 PM PST
by
TommyDale
To: SmithL
Guilty!
4
posted on
11/10/2010 12:29:42 PM PST
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Gubmint animals more equal than others it seems.
5
posted on
11/10/2010 12:29:55 PM PST
by
blackdog
To: SmithL
Because you can’t sue the government. Learn it. Love it.
6
posted on
11/10/2010 12:30:19 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
To: SmithL
No need to worry, folks. Obama's "Safe School Czar" is on the job!
Obama's "Safe School Czar" Kevin
"use a condom" Jennings
__________________________________________________________
From the Washington Times...
EDITORIAL: At the president's pleasure
'Safe school czar' encouraged child sex with an older man
September 28, 2009
A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar". ..."
According to Mr. Jennings' own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the "older man" in a "bus station bathroom" and was taken to the older man's home that night...".
On the tape, Mr. Jennings recollected that he told the student to make sure "to use a condom" when he was with the older man. That he actively encouraged the relationship is reinforced by Mr. Jennings' own description in his 1994 book, "One Teacher in 10." In that account, the teacher boasts how he allayed the student's concerns about the relationship to such a degree that the 15-year-old "left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated." ...
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/at-the-presidents-pleasure/
__________________________________________________________
7
posted on
11/10/2010 12:30:40 PM PST
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: edcoil
Not Government Officials.
8
posted on
11/10/2010 12:30:53 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
To: SmithL
But the kid kept going with her and getting molested....until...yup...they got caught...and it became all her fault.
Looks like the court didn't go stupid on this one. Too bad kid...
To: SmithL
“because what he did was so far outside the scope of his job”
I think that would be where the “negligence” part comes in.
To: edcoil
Priests don’t have a taxpayer funded union.
11
posted on
11/10/2010 12:34:20 PM PST
by
WOBBLY BOB
( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
To: SmithL
The accountability should be in the criminal justice system and should be demanded of the perpetrators.
Why should the tax payers be held accountable for this?
To: TommyDale
13
posted on
11/10/2010 12:34:58 PM PST
by
WOBBLY BOB
( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
To: SmithL
The school isn't responsible for the teacher's conduct, the court said back then, because what he did was so far outside the scope of his job1) It was a she2No duh!
14
posted on
11/10/2010 12:34:58 PM PST
by
fml
To: SmithL
What do you think this is? The Catholic Church?
The NEA-USA is unaccountable. So is the UN.
15
posted on
11/10/2010 12:35:38 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: SmithL
Reason #492 to homeschool.
16
posted on
11/10/2010 12:36:38 PM PST
by
Oberon
(Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
To: SmithL
The school isn't responsible for the teacher's conduct, the court said back then, because what he did was so far outside the scope of his job1- BS
2 - He was a she
3 - I should hope so
17
posted on
11/10/2010 12:37:22 PM PST
by
fml
To: SmithL; wagglebee
But it's only a step beyond the state Supreme Court's 1989 ruling that threw out a suit against the Oakland Unified School District by a junior high student who said his teacher molested him during a school-sponsored work session at the teacher's apartment. The school isn't responsible for the teacher's conduct, the court said back then, because what he did was so far outside the scope of his job. San Fransicko/Okland culture of corruption PING.
18
posted on
11/10/2010 12:37:32 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: SmithL
Apparently the child has no ‘legal standing’.
19
posted on
11/10/2010 12:37:44 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: SmithL
Beauty is only a 6-pack away!
Well....maybe a 12-pack.....
20
posted on
11/10/2010 12:37:51 PM PST
by
massmike
(...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson