Posted on 11/09/2010 9:07:21 PM PST by Tom Hawks
On Monday, MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan seemed to suggest the time may be right for violent revolution in the United States.
While interviewing liberal cartoonist Ted Rall, the host appeared to support the idea. Lachlan Markay of Newsbusters quoted the host:
"Are things in our country so bad that it might actually be time for a revolution?" Ratigan asked. "The answer obviously is yes," he added, and "the only question is how to do it."
Rall was promoting his book, "The Anti-American Manifesto", where he calls for violent revolution. Ed Morrissey of Hot Air posted an excerpt from the book:
We are here because the U.S. is going to end soon. There’s going to be an intense, violent, probably haphazard struggle for control. It’s going to come down to us versus them. The question is: What are you going to do about it?…
Christian fundamentalists, the millennial end-of-theworlders obsessed with the Left Behind series about the End Times, neo-Nazi racists, rural black-helicopter Michigan Militia types cut from the same inbred cloth as Timothy McVeigh, allied with “mainstream” gun nuts and right-wing Republicans, have been planning, preparing, and praying for the destruction of the “Godless,” “secular” United States for decades. In the past, they formed groups like the John Birch Society and the Aryan Nations. Now the hard Right has a postmodern, decentralized non-organization organization called the Tea Party.
Right-wing organizational names change, but they amount to the same thing: the reactionary sociopolitical force—the sole force—poised to fill the vacuum when collapse occurs. The scenario outlined by Margaret Atwood’s prescient novel The Handmaid’s Tale—rednecks in the trenches, hard military men running things, minorities and liberals taken away and massacred, setting the stage for an even more extreme form of laissez-faire corporate capitalism than we’re suffering under today—is a fair guess of how a post-U.S. scenario will play out unless we prepare to turn it in another direction…
A war is coming. At stake: our lives, the planet, freedom, living. The government, the corporations, and the extreme right are prepared to coalesce into an Axis of Evil. Are you going to fight back? Will you do whatever it takes, including taking up arms?
From this excerpt, one gets the impression that Rall is calling for a civil war between liberals and conservatives - specifically the Tea Party, and he appears to openly call for liberals to take up arms against anyone on the right.
When Sharron Angle spoke of a "2nd Amendment solution" to the nation's problems, liberal media outlets like MSNBC went berserk. But Ratigan appeared to be okay with liberals taking to the streets in open, armed conflict.
In early October, Rall expressed support for a communist-style dictatorship in the United States in an interview with washingtoncitypaper.com.
In that interview, he said Thomas Jefferson was the American leader he admired the most. However, the man who helped create America's founding documents would probably not support a communist dictatorship.
In the interview with Ratigan, Rall ironically quoted John Locke; "It's up to the people. John Locke said, the people have an obligation to revolt when their government's fails.
Markay noted the irony:
That's right, Rall quoted the philosopher arguably most influential among American revolutionaries to suggest that another revolution would be justified. Gee, that sure sounds a lot like Tea Party protesters holding up signs demanding we "water the tree of liberty" - with the blood of patriots and tyrants, as Thomas Jefferson famously said.
Apparently, liberals calling for violent revolution and a Soviet-style communist dictatorship in the United States is okay with the hosts at MSNBC, but conservatives who want a return to Constitutional principles are radical.
Ah. So "gun control" really means, "THEIR-gun-control"?
Figures. Thanks for the warning from Gay Bay.
When did liberals ever do this in the entire history of the world?
They aren't liberals; they're "progressives", which is what neo-Stalinists have called themselves since the 40's to disguise themselves.
The liberals, if there are any left, are all in the shadows now, overawed and overcome by the "progressives" and their anti-human meme.
White weenie anti-white libs who are trying to agitate their useful idiots on the left into an armed revolt. Standard fare for commies, sacrifice the non-white peasants for the greater cause of communism while they munch granola.
PING!
Love the pic and the post. It seems the left is running scared and want to blame any body that disagrees with them.
Rall is a NUT JOB!!!!
[Mrs]T
Can you imagine if two Conservatives discussed one of them selling a book on the subject and egging Conservatives to a violent revolution?
The Communists were hoping that the TP would start something and were disappointed by the lack of violence! This happens every time they lose an election. Maybe this time they’ll deliver on their threats and enable us to get rid of ALL of them, followed by outlawing their institutions and yes...THOUGHTS!
Well, let them start their violent end. The liberty tree would die it’s watered by their poisonous blood, however, the pavement would be washed clean of the grime by their corrosive Communist puss in no time!
Caution: the notion that the sissies are not armed, are afraid of guns, etc. IS WRONG! They are as vicious as criminals, union thugs, 0ba_mites, serial killers and redundantly speaking, Communists get! Learn from history and don’t take clichés for granted.
If it reaches that point, the Communists will be crushed, that I have no doubt about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.