Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
You don’t see the difference there? You don’t see the financial and personal conflict of interest for both Kagan and Sotomayor?

No. I guess I don't have your imagination.

45 posted on 11/08/2010 3:40:46 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

The fact that you would call the very obvious financial conflict of interest a figment of my imagination speaks volumes about you.

If SCOTUS rules that Obama was never lawfully declared the winner of the electoral vote, Kagan and Sotomayor will be thrown out by their ears and can kiss their paychecks and reputations good-bye.

If you can’t even see something as concrete and obvious as that, it’s pretty much pointless for me to try to point out anything to you.


47 posted on 11/08/2010 3:49:08 PM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur; butterdezillion
No. I guess I don't have your imagination.

The question is did Kagan represent the government or Obama in one or the many other Supreme Court cases about Obama's eligibility when she was the United States Solicitor General?

48 posted on 11/08/2010 3:49:45 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson