Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


Photo (November 4, 2010)

The FAA said the first plane that passed over Willis Tower recently, stirring the crowd below and leading a reader to e-mail the Tribune about it, was a Boeing 747-400 cargo plane, the largest plane that operates in the Chicago area. It crossed over the top of the Willis (formerly called Sears Tower) at 4,000 feet, said FAA spokesman Tony Molinaro.

"At this height the plane was about 2,300 feet above the top of the building, or more than double the needed distance," Molinaro said. Willis Tower is 1,730 feet tall.

8 posted on 11/08/2010 6:56:36 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: A.A. Cunningham

That’s not a 747. That one has two engines near the tail. The 747 has four engines under the wings.


11 posted on 11/08/2010 6:59:02 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (0bama thought he'd find "common ground" on 0bamaCare because of ROMNEYCARE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Looks like a DC-9.


15 posted on 11/08/2010 7:01:41 AM PST by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Since when did 747 engines get moved to the back & off the wings?


18 posted on 11/08/2010 7:05:55 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Is the plane in your photo claimed to be a 747? Looks more like a Canada RegionalJet.


19 posted on 11/08/2010 7:07:20 AM PST by dusttoyou (Let the other side get all wee-wee'd up, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Maybe there is more sotry here:

The FAA said the FIRST plane was a 747, etc, etc, etc.

THIS plane is NOT a 747.

I sure would like to hope that the FAA knows the difference.!!!

Were there 2 planes ? More?


22 posted on 11/08/2010 7:09:09 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

When did Boeing decide to take the four engines off the wing and put two on the rear? I must have missed that design change.


24 posted on 11/08/2010 7:11:32 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Hate to break it to the FAA but that is an S80 not a 747.


31 posted on 11/08/2010 7:37:50 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham

This image does not show a Boeing 747 of any sort. Anyone with even two functioning brain cells can determine that ...

32 posted on 11/08/2010 7:39:25 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson