Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Christie irks NBC’s David Gregory by calling him an ‘advocate’
Daily Caller ^ | 11/7/10 | Alex Pappas

Posted on 11/07/2010 7:49:26 AM PST by Nachum

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie irked NBC’s David Gregory — and probably won over more conservatives weary of the media in the process — by suggesting on “Meet the Press” that the host was acting as an advocate for Democrats in the way he spoke about taxes.

Christie, a Republican known for his tell-it-like-it-is attitude, disagreed with Gregory’s characterization of the looming battle in Congress over the Bush years tax rate as “tax cuts.”

Christie, making it known that he disagrees with how analysts say that, said: “This is maintaining the current tax policy in a weak economy, and what you’re advocating through your question is…”

Gregory interrupted: “That’s not fair. I’m not advocating. I’m questioning whether or not they have to be paid for.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: chris; christie; irks; nbcs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2010 7:49:30 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I’m not advocating. I’m questioning whether or not they have to be paid for.”

Gregory's lack of self-awareness is striking. His "questioning" is from the Dem template. Conservatives don't feel that taxes have to be "paid for"; they feel that the money belongs to the person paying the taxes.

2 posted on 11/07/2010 7:52:02 AM PST by Carling (Remember November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

GO CHRISTIE!!!


3 posted on 11/07/2010 7:52:49 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

How does one pay for tax cuts? Raise taxes?

Cut spending, ya dope. 700 billion? Say doesn’t ObamaCare costs about that much?


4 posted on 11/07/2010 7:54:25 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Tax cuts never have to be “paid for”. That phrase was concocted somewhere over in the far left and has become part of the liberal lexicon.


5 posted on 11/07/2010 7:54:32 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carling

He was totally advocating. He also played up “the tea party as liability” angle.


6 posted on 11/07/2010 7:54:49 AM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I love the fearlessness of this guy.


7 posted on 11/07/2010 7:55:01 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Gregory interrupted: “That’s not fair. I’m not advocating. I’m questioning whether or not they have to be paid for.”

This is such a myth that tax cuts have to pay for themselves. It's not the government's money. If the government doesn't have enough money then reduce spending.

8 posted on 11/07/2010 7:56:01 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

David Gregory is living proof of Christine O’Donnell’s statement about “Apes are still evolving”


9 posted on 11/07/2010 7:56:03 AM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And this is how every GOP congressional critter should respond to the lib media questioners. As Rush Limbaugh stated last week on his show, do not agree with their premises when they ask you a question. Shoot it down. Then substantively state your position and and the reasoning how you arrived at that position.


10 posted on 11/07/2010 7:56:06 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Rope a dope.


11 posted on 11/07/2010 7:56:59 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’s on now


12 posted on 11/07/2010 7:57:01 AM PST by Krankor (I can't see me loving nobody but you- for all my life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

It is about time! Republicans need to be quick to respond to these Democrat Talking Heads on the alphabet stations.
The liberal Talking Heads are the minority in this country.
Why not engage liberals when they make such foolish remarks.
Conservatives should not back down.


13 posted on 11/07/2010 7:57:05 AM PST by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This reminds me of an episode of Stossel recently. He had Joe Trppi on and Joe could not or would not grasp the question as to why people should be allowed to make choices for themselves. He couldn’t get the idea that people should be able to choose their own lightbulbs. He kept talking about saving the planet.


14 posted on 11/07/2010 7:58:05 AM PST by NCBraveheart ("oderint dum metuant"........Let them hate, as long as they fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I’m all for raising the top marginal income tax rate on leftists David Gregory and his wife Beth Wilkinson back to 91% as it was in 1963.


15 posted on 11/07/2010 7:58:28 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The question should be, Why anyone should receive a pay cut because of the government’s irresponsibility?


16 posted on 11/07/2010 7:58:50 AM PST by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Tax cuts never have to be “paid for”. That phrase was concocted somewhere over in the far left and has become part of the liberal lexicon."

Exactly!

17 posted on 11/07/2010 7:59:35 AM PST by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

“I love the fearlessness of this guy.”

It’s funny, or sad depending on perspective.
I really like Christie, I may not always agree with him, but you know what you’re getting. Christie says what he means and means what he says. Christie states his positions, and then attempts to govern based on his stated position. Christie isn’t a typical professional politician who will fold, change or equivocate based on the prevailing winds.

But, here on FR, Christie is not 100% conservative, so he’s regarded as an amusing RINO. I stated support for Christie and was flamed because Christie isn’t conservative enough in all areas.

Odd.


18 posted on 11/07/2010 7:59:46 AM PST by brownsfan (D - swift death of the republic, R - lingering death for the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Truth Hurts.


19 posted on 11/07/2010 8:01:04 AM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carling

There are two points of view.

The Republican view is to “maintain current tax rates.”

The Democrat view is to “extend the Bush tax cuts.”

Gregory questions from the Democrat point of view.


20 posted on 11/07/2010 8:04:43 AM PST by Nextrush (Slocialist Republicans and Socialist Democrats need to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson