Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Considers Medicaid Withdrawal
State-Controlled NY Times ^ | Nov. 6, 2010 | Comrade EMILY RAMSHAW

Posted on 11/06/2010 6:14:22 PM PDT by USALiberty

Some Republican lawmakers — still reveling in Tuesday’s statewide election sweep — are proposing an unprecedented solution to the state’s estimated $25 billion budget shortfall: dropping out of the federal Medicaid program.

Far-right conservatives are offering that possibility in impassioned news conferences. Moderate Republicans are studying it behind closed doors. And the party’s advisers on health care policy say it is being discussed more seriously than ever, though they admit it may be as much a huge in-your-face to Washington as anything else.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: socialism; statesrights; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
YES! It is ABOUT TIME!
1 posted on 11/06/2010 6:14:25 PM PDT by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

GO...GO...GO.


2 posted on 11/06/2010 6:17:44 PM PDT by gthog61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

bttt


3 posted on 11/06/2010 6:18:30 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

Health care IS NOT A RIGHT! Can’t pay the doc? NOT my problem. Don’t force me to pay!


4 posted on 11/06/2010 6:18:55 PM PDT by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

If they succeed, it could be the end of the welfare state as we know it. That, or the second civil war.


5 posted on 11/06/2010 6:24:28 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

More states need to consider such action. You always hear about states whining about the federal government having too much power but they have no problems taking federal money with strings attached.


6 posted on 11/06/2010 6:26:43 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Most government spending since FDR has been Unconstitutional. Progressive (non-uniform) tax rates are Unconstitutional. Fiat money is Unconstitutional—the Constitution forbids anything other than gold and silver coins being used as “Tender in Payment of Debt.”

Given that, the Tea Party should make clear that ALL US Treasury debt is invalid and will NOT ever be paid back, because it was used to fund Unconstitutional expenditures, based on Unconstitutional money, and repayment was predicated on Unconstitutional tax rates.

Since the Tea Party dislikes government debt so much, voters should really like the idea of eliminating all government debt in this way. And if the global bond market starts to believe that this policy will actually win out in the United States, thety will stop buying US government debt. And that will shut down socialism and progressivism faster than the voters themselves could ever hope to accomplish.


7 posted on 11/06/2010 6:26:43 PM PDT by sourcery (Poor Nancy: From Speaker OF the House to...Speaker UNDER the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
Combine this with a compassionate program of helping ex Medicaid enrollees to move to California for uninterrupted benefits, while soliciting California business could make this a triple whammy for Texas.
8 posted on 11/06/2010 6:27:35 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

It is outrageous and IMMORAL to ask working Americans to pay for the health care of LAZY welfare recipients and their brats who share a mother but not the same fathers. Want health insurance? WORK for it!


9 posted on 11/06/2010 6:28:49 PM PDT by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Tough Love!


10 posted on 11/06/2010 6:30:11 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

What would that actually mean??


11 posted on 11/06/2010 6:32:58 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

I think Texas should not just look at dropping Medicaid and CHIPS but follow through with ending both programs. It’s not MY responsibility to pay for someone else’s medical care with my taxes. It’s high time to end the welfare state as we know it and hopefully Texans have the cajones to follow through with this proposal. If the welfare-sucking slugs don’t like it, let them leave the state to we Texans not frightened by hard work and doing things on our own.


12 posted on 11/06/2010 6:34:08 PM PDT by bigredkitty1 (March 5,2010. Rest in peace, sweet boy. I will miss you, Big Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

YES!!!!!!!


13 posted on 11/06/2010 6:34:44 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

I love it! DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER!


14 posted on 11/06/2010 6:35:59 PM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigredkitty1
end the welfare state as we know it

End the welfare state PERIOD. NO WELFARE. PERIOD.
15 posted on 11/06/2010 6:37:10 PM PDT by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

I agree. I am weary of the welfare crowd.


16 posted on 11/06/2010 6:37:10 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

D@mn! You sound just like my twin sister. She has said virtually the same thing for YEARS! Medical care is just service rendered by a medical professional. These services are the financial responsibility of the person receiving the services, not the US taxpayers.

(By the way, I LOVE my identical twin sister!)


17 posted on 11/06/2010 6:44:26 PM PDT by bigredkitty1 (March 5,2010. Rest in peace, sweet boy. I will miss you, Big Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
“Because of the substantial amount of matching money that comes from the federal government,” Mr. Zerwas said, “there’s an economic impact that comes from that. If we start to look at what that impact is, we have to consider whether it’s feasible to not participate.”

FREE MONEY!!!! A big ol' pile of free money!!!

Mr. Zerwas (or the reporter) have remembered that the federal governments money also comes from taxpayers, including Texas taxpayers.

18 posted on 11/06/2010 6:47:11 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Most of those “impoverished Texans” in Medicaid and CHIPS swam across our Southern border.

It is past time to cut their free services.


19 posted on 11/06/2010 6:47:31 PM PDT by Texas56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Before everybody jumps all over us for being heartless monsters who want children to suffer:

Many hospitals in Texas, including the big systems like Harris, have their own insurance plan. If you’re poor, you can chip in a few dollars a month for health insurance. Then you get your care through their hospitals and their clinics and physicians. They offer a variety of plans—HMO types, child-oriented, preferred provider, etc. They get preventive care which keeps major, expensive problems from developing. The important thing is, the poor get care without draining the state budgets altogether, and the hospital gets some compensation.

Even the poor can afford a few bucks for their own care, and when they have some skin in the game, so to speak, they not only avoid treating the ER as a place to watch Oprah reruns all night, but actually begin to act in a responsible way about consuming medical services.

But let’s be honest about this system: the hospitals still do get funding from the state, even if it’s not Medicaid, so it’s not as if the poor suddenly went out to purchase $1500-a-month Blue Cross/Blue Shield private policies.


20 posted on 11/06/2010 6:48:08 PM PDT by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson