Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP's Sarah Palin problem
Wash Post ^ | 11/5/10 | Michael Gerson

Posted on 11/05/2010 9:40:41 PM PDT by pissant

At their new political high-water mark, Republicans have plenty of reasons to celebrate - and at least one large cause for worry.

On Election Day, voters shattered the Obama agenda of expanded public benefits and increased income tax progressivity, leaving the president to reassemble his goals with glue and tape. During this midterm cycle, Republicans became reacquainted with estranged friends: independents, seniors, college-educated voters, working-class voters, rural voters and suburban voters. The Republican Party will benefit from the infusion of diverse, attractive new leaders, including some, such as Florida Sen.-elect Marco Rubio, with Tea Party pedigrees.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2010; christineodonnell; extremism; gop; palin; sharronangle; sleazy; tancredo; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: microgood
The scary thing about her is that she thinks she is qualified to be President.

How is she not qualified?

81 posted on 11/05/2010 10:59:16 PM PDT by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: microgood
The scary thing about her is that she thinks she is qualified to be President. If McCain had not cynically picked her to save his bid for Presidency, we would not be talking about her.

First of all, this is a moronic statement. Barack Obama is the President Of the United States. This means that everyone on earth is qualified to be President Of The United States.

Secondly, people at FR were talking about Palin as potential Presidential material long before McCain chose her as his running mate.

When you're wrong, you're totally wrong. Wanna make it 3 for 3?

82 posted on 11/05/2010 11:00:09 PM PDT by Chunga (The Democratic Party Is A Criminal Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: loboinok

Since I don’t think they should even be able to vote, what makes you think I’d want one as CIC.

13 posted on Friday, July 23, 2010 2:20:02 PM by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)


83 posted on 11/05/2010 11:00:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. ~Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

SO you dismiss Nixon for Watergate? I dismiss him for being a liberal idiot, who saddled us with the EPA and tried to shove the ERA down our throats. Harding, was a rock ribbed conservative.


84 posted on 11/05/2010 11:01:06 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: pissant
And even if their two positions were identical, then why dismiss Pence and praise Palin?

Because I can actually see Palin as a conservative, because of her stated positions. You irrationally do not. Because you have interpreted her statements as being in favor of Amnesty, which she has stated many times she is not.

Furthermore, do a google search on Mike Pence and AZ1070 and see how many articles come up.

Do the same search with Sarah and see what comes up.

Sarah was all over this issue, Mike, hardly a peep.


85 posted on 11/05/2010 11:01:13 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Michael John Gerson is also for gays serving openly in the military.

Case closed on the RINO troll.


86 posted on 11/05/2010 11:02:05 PM PDT by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Well......It is getting past bedtime.


87 posted on 11/05/2010 11:02:09 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Gerson is a R I N O.
88 posted on 11/05/2010 11:02:12 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Pence was the architect of the mandatory “touchback” program. Weak tea, I know.

You're right, rather meaningless in the big picture when comparing their two positions on this issue.
89 posted on 11/05/2010 11:03:04 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Palin didn’t “vote” on TARP either, but she was even more a cheerleader for it than her mentor, Juan McCain, who did.


90 posted on 11/05/2010 11:03:07 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Show me where I “dismissed” President Nixon for his role in the Watergate scandal. President Harding was conservative, but that doesn’t excuse his cronyism and the Teapot Dome incident, or do you think it does?


91 posted on 11/05/2010 11:05:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. ~Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Sarah detractors are firing blanks.

The entire lamestream has taken their best and most vile shots at her for over two years and counting, and they’re out of ammo.

Now it’s the RINO’S turn and they’re weak sisters...LOL.

Same goes for the anti-Palin posters here.


92 posted on 11/05/2010 11:06:03 PM PDT by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Good Lord. WOO HOO go Harding. Glad to know your hatred goes that far. Have fun tomorrow, life is short.


93 posted on 11/05/2010 11:06:18 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: pissant; eyedigress
Palin didn’t “vote” on TARP either, but she was even more a cheerleader for it than her mentor, Juan McCain, who did.

Yes she was, initially, however, she walked back her support later.
94 posted on 11/05/2010 11:06:57 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Same goes for the anti-Palin posters here.

Yup!

It's last gasp of the PDS sufferers.
95 posted on 11/05/2010 11:07:57 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
There are indeed anti-Palin folks in the party who don’t want her to succeed, but not nearly so many as the press wants us to believe.

Yes on both counts.

96 posted on 11/05/2010 11:08:22 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I won’t let that go. McCain left the campaign and you tie that to Palin.....You are a lost child.


97 posted on 11/05/2010 11:09:29 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Perhaps. Nonetheless, he’s bitten his tongue since, or rather, was chastised sufficiently to shut up. But you brought it up, not me.

Nonetheless, my only point in mentioning his name is that he ain’t a lightweight


98 posted on 11/05/2010 11:09:49 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Were you with him when he wrote that? Then how do you know he “wrote it all by himself” other than the mythology that started as he lay on that rooming house bed, dying? If they can make up tons of stuff about Obama, JFK, FDR and others, why do we doubt that they were doing the same in the 19th Century?

There were five transcripts of this speech, all written by Lincoln himself. The one we see now is the one he signed for a friend several months after the speech. So unless someone recited it to him, it was his.

In 1952, at the end of Truman's presidency, he walked out of the White House without Secret Service, and took the train back home. Think 80 years before that, they did not have staff or speechwriters. Politicians had to write their own speeches. They would have been considered frauds if they did not.
99 posted on 11/05/2010 11:10:56 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: pissant

On the other hand YOU are saying TARP was bad.....hmmmmm Anything else you want to throw in the bad bucket.......


100 posted on 11/05/2010 11:12:09 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson