Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donna

“Then the homeowners deserve what they get.”

Can you explain why?


5 posted on 11/05/2010 3:58:16 PM PDT by dljordan ("His father's sword he hath girded on, And his wild harp slung behind him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: dljordan

They’re defaulting on their loans. They deserve to be foreclosed on.

BUT of course when it comes down to it, the bank can’t foreclose, because they destroyed the note and sold divisions of an electronic shadow purporting to be the note to multiple legal entities. The bank has no actual right to be the recipient of the mortgage payments anyway.

House-holders who’s wet-signature note has been destroyed should consider paying into escrow pending settlement of the note status.

And if it turns out that nobody holds the note then house-holders have little option but to consider a writ of adverse possession. I doubt they’ll ever get clear title in any other way - certainly not by paying their mortgage.


8 posted on 11/05/2010 4:08:39 PM PDT by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dljordan

You don’t get delinquent in payments to cheat your way into a government bailout.


10 posted on 11/05/2010 4:21:54 PM PDT by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson