Posted on 11/04/2010 2:34:16 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee are among possible Republican nominations but who else could oppose the president? more...
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
I hope you’re right, but let’s prepare anyway.
I guess now there are TWO people who think it is a good idea.
Good, but going on a limb and throwing out names: Howie Carr, Mark Steyn, Ted Nugent or the one and only Rush Limbaugh. No Women, we need a strong, sharp man for the times that we live in.
I liked Gingrich for a long time, until he sat on the couch with Pelosi and ran his mouth about global warming.
He is damaged goods.
Allen West
Marco Rubio
Bobby Jindal
Tom Coburn
Rick Perry
C. Christie
JC Watts
Michelle Bachmann
Not just no but H&*l no to Huckabee, Romney etc...
Probably I am not in the majority on this, but I hope for someone who is very real and not “rock star” or “slick”...just someone who comes off as quite human. I can’t think specifically who that would be.
Allen West, pres. and Rubio, v pres. With enough experience would be a smash. Besides it would be fun to watch the libs go epileptic.
If the election were held today—
Huckabee would win 52-44.
Romney would win 50-45.
Gingrich would lose 47-49.
Palin would lose 44-52.
Palin is basically the GOP version of Howard Dean: a bomb thrower well-liked by the base, and alienating the swing voters in the process.
Personally, I want to see what Mike Pence and John Thune have to offer. Rubio and Christie probably won’t be in for 2012, and Mitch Daniels seems like David Brooks so far.
I hate to upset you, but I don’t think Palin can win in a national election. She would be a great asset as RNC chair, but not so good as a candidate.
She will not be able to get the voters she would need to win.
Wonder why so many other hopefuls have been pretty quiet?
They do because they have not been out there saying stuff to polarize and offend some of the masses they will need to win. Politics isn’t about being emotional. If you lose it doesn’t matter who voted for you and loved you. It still means you lost.
Sounds sick, but the 2010 races convinced me Palin could not win Ohio, Colorado, even Iowa. Look at who won in Iowa. Mostly democrats. In Ohio, Kasich won the governorship, but he isn’t all that conservative.
Without these states no pubbie can win. Like it or not.
You are certainly not alone. Most woman would prefer a man to be in charge. Survey after survey reveals it.
You nailed it. That is exactly what they would do.
Absolutely not Huckabee. He is a social justice race baiter and we don’t need anymore division by race after Obama. In addition, he’s a “compassionate” conservative and we need someone who will stand up to unethical destructive tendencies of globalist bankers and multinationals, reform the government’s scope and size and get this AMERICAN economy running again.
Two Well Spoken, Intelligent and telegenic Men, respectively of African and Cuban descent, will put them into a tail spin. Let the games begin!!!!!!!!
Tony Soprano?
I would vote for vandersloot over obama.
My heart and soul wants sarah, but my head says Thune. He can unite everyone we need, the fiscal cons, social cons, middle america cons, women lOoking for good looking guy, etc etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.