Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Golden Hookah Award: Michelle Obama’s $400-Million Plan to Fight ‘Food Deserts’
CNSNews ^ | November 4, 2010 | Craig Bannister

Posted on 11/04/2010 12:06:16 PM PDT by jazusamo

(CNSNews.com) – The latest “Golden Hookah” award for outrageous government spending, presented by CNSNews.com, goes to First Lady Michelle Obama for calling on Congress to create a $400-million-a-year program to encourage the establishment of supermarkets in places she calls “food deserts.”

“To do that,” the first lady has said, “we’re creating a Healthy Food Financing Initiative that’s going to invest $400 million a year -- and leverage hundreds of millions more from the private sector -- to bring grocery stores to underserved areas and help places like convenience stores carry healthier options.”

Pushing this $400-million food-desert-eradication plan has been a staple of Michelle Obama’s stump speeches. So, while the agricultural bill that’s been working its way through Congress includes an earmark of “only” $40 million for the program, this week’s Golden Hookah goes to the First Lady for asking taxpayers to pony up $400 million a year to pay for her anti-food desert pipe-dream.

VIDEO 3:57 minutes

The Golden Hookah is the symbolic token that CNSNews.com confers on government agencies that win our “What Were They Smoking Award” for outrageous government spending. CNSNews.com presents the award weekly to a component of government that has distinguished itself in taking the hard-earned money of taxpayers and sending it up in smoke.

Inspired by CNSNews.com stories that exposed federal grants used to subsidize research on hookah smoking in Syria and Jordan, the “Golden Hookah” symbolizes how a prodigal government squanders the taxpayers’ money on outrageous, unconstitutional and unconscionable programs. Each weekly video presentation of the “Golden Hookah” includes a “Taxpayer Tally,” indicating how many average American households need to work hard and pay taxes all year just to fund the winning program.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fooddeserts; goldenhookahaward; michelleobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2010 12:06:20 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
When is this moronic Hippo Azz going to go away??
2 posted on 11/04/2010 12:10:01 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Believe me, if it were profitable for grocery chains to be in those areas, they would be.

The truth is that high crime rates have forced them to leave the areas. Government subsidy will not lower the crime in those areas.


3 posted on 11/04/2010 12:10:01 PM PDT by SpinnerWebb (In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Michelle Obama’s $400-Million Plan to eat all the world’s ‘Food Deserts’.


4 posted on 11/04/2010 12:10:51 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Please bump the Freepathon and donate or become a monthly donor!

5 posted on 11/04/2010 12:11:38 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Mouldy Hooker Award


6 posted on 11/04/2010 12:11:49 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Food deserts form where it’s simply not economical to sell food, usually because of violence. The only shops available have much higher prices than normal - because their insurance rates are higher, their staff costs are higher, and so on.

400 million a year will do nothing useful except distort the free market - but will put 400 million into the pockets of left-wing sleaze buckets.


7 posted on 11/04/2010 12:11:49 PM PDT by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

$400 million wouldn’t even finance the Obama family India trip for 2 days of chatting with sex workers. I’m not saying “food deserts” aren’t an egregious waste of time / money, but it’s not even the worst example of monetary excess by Michelle Obama this week.


8 posted on 11/04/2010 12:12:07 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Michelle’s All You Can Eat Food Desert!

This week’s special:

All-You-Can-Eat-Lobster!!!!!


9 posted on 11/04/2010 12:12:29 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Didn’t the author mean ‘profligate’ not ‘prodigal’?

Maybe MO should investigate the purchases that suck up the $billions from productive, over-burdened tax-payers’ to subsidize food stamps - creating a population of non-working, obese welfare mothers and their kids.


10 posted on 11/04/2010 12:12:29 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

LOL!

Give her a little time and I’d bet she could.


11 posted on 11/04/2010 12:12:41 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
I meant to say "due to violence and theft", oops.
12 posted on 11/04/2010 12:13:19 PM PDT by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Correct, this is an out and out liberal “feel good” boondoggle.


13 posted on 11/04/2010 12:14:41 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

“Prodigal” means “foolish spending,” too, although I think “profligate” is a better choice in the context.


14 posted on 11/04/2010 12:16:18 PM PDT by Tax-chick (The Most High rules the kingdom of men and gives it to whom He will. (Dan 4:25))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This sounds like yet another lame element of the “food justice” for which the SanFran city council claimed to be fighting when they banned happy meals.


15 posted on 11/04/2010 12:20:13 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: SpinnerWebb

I foresee milk at $25 per gallon, subsidized by us.


17 posted on 11/04/2010 12:25:23 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Agreed and Frisco and their happy meal fiasco is unbelievable. They’re probably a lot more nutritious than what many young ones are fed at home.


18 posted on 11/04/2010 12:27:04 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

In urban areas it’s usually because of violence, in rural areas it’s usually because of low population density. I realize MO doesn’t think about rural areas, but last I read it, her proposal didn’t exclude them either.


19 posted on 11/04/2010 12:27:12 PM PDT by Ellendra (Profanity is the mark of a conversational cripple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Banning happy meals is right up there with banning marijuana spiked brownies.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/middle-school-students-brownies.html


20 posted on 11/04/2010 12:27:28 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson