Skip to comments.
Fox: Chris Coons has beaten Christine O’Donnell in DE Senate Seat
Posted on 11/02/2010 5:14:30 PM PDT by jern
coons
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; backstabberromney; backstabberrove; backstabbingrinos; breaking; de; de2010; rove; stenchofcornyn; stenchofpalin; stenchofromney; stenchofrove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 301-308 next last
To: martinidon
FOX reporting that bitter butt hurt republicans were not unified behind ODonnell.
Democrats were solidly behind Coons, independents had a 3 point difference between the 2 candidates.
If this race is close, it’s on the establishment.
Delaware prefers Marxism I guess
102
posted on
11/02/2010 5:34:36 PM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(gopbriefingroom.com)
To: CheneyLives; Admin Moderator
The wicked witch is dead. yay. You're celebrating the victory of the marxist? What would Cheney say?
103
posted on
11/02/2010 5:34:55 PM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
(Does not play well with others)
To: paulycy
RINOs held up the money. That race was all about Palin. They wanted to check her power surge.
To: jern
christine .... a victim of the Roveanists and the Steele-heads.... sorry day for both Rove and Steele.
To: eddie willers
-And anybody who wants to now brand these guys as "enemies" can go sit with Obama. " They 'ARE' enemies! and they can KISS MY USS!
To: shield
Coons was called with 0% in. Exit polling isn’t actual votes.
Anyone remember Dan Rather?
Let’s wait for some actual votes
107
posted on
11/02/2010 5:35:59 PM PDT
by
wilco200
(11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
To: workerbee
Oh good grief. We never HAD Delaware, Sherlock. And even had Castle been the nominee and won, he already said he had no intention of helping repeal Deathcare.
Castle would have done ONE thing that would have made a MAJOR difference nation wide: he would have caucused with the GOP and, thus, probably made the difference in who controls the Senate. I didn't like him, didn't agree with him on many issues, but he nevertheless would have caucused the right way and brought control of the Senate to the GOP. Now, because of this loss, the Dems will maintain the Senate, Obama will be able to appoint more Judges to the Federal Bench, and we can't stop 'em. Our liberties will continue to be eroded in the courts and more un-born babies will die.
Don't misunderstand. I wanted O'Donnell to win both in the Primary and then in the general election. But I don't see ANYTHING good in Coons winning.
108
posted on
11/02/2010 5:36:27 PM PDT
by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: shield
What are the numbers!!!!!!!!!!!!! Zilch as of yet.
To: workerbee
And even had Castle been the nominee and won, he already said he had no intention of helping repeal Deathcare.People keep missing the big picture. With a majority you now have Committee chairs and you can determine what does, or does not, get out of committee to the floor.
I would much rather have a Castle and a Tarkanian than a Coons and a Reid.
RINOs could be given a small voice in the Party.... could even be ignored....but their number would speak loudly.
To: jern
111
posted on
11/02/2010 5:37:02 PM PDT
by
FTJM
To: GOP_Lady
They were only correct because they sabotaged her
To: muawiyah
Exactly. The Senate was always a stretch goal that only came on in the last couple of months. O’Donnell, McMahon, Raese, Fiorina and Angle were always long shots. Toomey and Kirk should be wins though based on more than recent hype. They lose and the night will be a bit hollow.
113
posted on
11/02/2010 5:37:49 PM PDT
by
paul544
To: jern
Well, the Politico.com Election 2010 has Maryland already going to Mikulski who only has 46.1% of the vote with Wargotz carrying 52.1% of the vote! Wha?
114
posted on
11/02/2010 5:38:03 PM PDT
by
FortWorthPatriot
(Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
To: murron
Yeah, because after all they got Florida in 2000 right all 3 times they called it before midnight.
THIS IS BASED ON ZERO PERCENT RETURN!!!! It is not a result, it is just another poll.
115
posted on
11/02/2010 5:38:10 PM PDT
by
TexasGunRunner
(Spay or neuter your pet coons; especially the bearded marxist variety!)
To: Ann Archy
THOSE NASTY men could have Helped her win!!!Worse than that, they helped keep the Gucci Loafer crowd on K-Street going. We wanted to send Christine and so many more to nix these B@$ard$ to only have Rove and Kruthammer help keep this system and power structure alive.
They don't get it, they are poltical history and they don't know it yet. Their inboxes will be flooded, and we won't watch them, just like many of us turned off Noonan and Parker.
116
posted on
11/02/2010 5:38:13 PM PDT
by
taildragger
((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: GOP_Lady
Those two men, and I like Krauthammer, didn’t like Angle, Miller, O’Donnell, Rubio or Paul. Paul and Rubio won because they are in independent thinking states. Miller and Angle may still win too. What this election showed me is how low establishment Republicans are. If Rubio or Paul would have even been remotely weak, guys like Rove would have destroyed them, like they tried to do to O’Donnell before she even got going. They didn’t have to enthusiastically endorse her but they went out of their way to bring down the Republican support for her. Low budget
117
posted on
11/02/2010 5:38:26 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: muawiyah
I'll wait for the vote counts. Same here and in the meantime, Delaware is in my prayers for an O'Donnell victory and the election of a Christian Constitutional Conservative to the senate.
If that reprehensible Marxist Coons wins, my prayers will go out for the people of Delaware. They'll need the Good Lord to protect them from that vile man.
118
posted on
11/02/2010 5:38:31 PM PDT
by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
To: My hearts in London - Everett
POLITICO don’t have any numbers on Delaware either, but they have a check-mark next to Coons’s name!
To: Gosh I love this neighborhood
Or Rove made it happen. I think he should have kept his mouth shut.
Rove's comments were a double-edged sword. I'd point out that in saying what he did he not only solidified and focused support for O'Donnell, he also spurred a fundraising drive that gave her a much larger warchest than she would have had otherwise. I think it's open to debate whether he hurt her, or helped her and people are going to be discussing the matter long and far into "beating a dead horse" scenario.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 301-308 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson