———————I think Rush is pretty confused about what net neutrality actually means.———————
Cass Sunstein and others in government (and it’s marxist supporters) are making it clear what net neutrality actually means.
Did you see what Cass said? With that, it’s unlikely that Rush got it wrong.
————————Imposing some sort of “fairness doctrine” on the Internet is absolutely NOT what “net neutrality” means.-—————
Then you don’t realize how big of a threat Cass is to you.
He means what he says.
-————“Net neutrality” is the idea that Comcast, which provides VoIP telephone services as well as Internet connection services, should not be allowed to disrupt or block the VoIP telephone services of their competitors for the customers of their Internet connection service, for example.——————
That’s the sales pitch, yes. But unfortunately, you have people in washington who CLEARLY have a different definition.
He's not talking about net neutrality, he's talking about an online fairness doctrine. Those are two entirely different things.
Of course I say and do non-neutral things online, as everyone does, but a regulatory czar over online speech has nothing to do with "net neutrality" requiring Comcast to allow me to access a competing video content provider like Hulu or a competing telephone service provider like Vonage.