He's not talking about net neutrality, he's talking about an online fairness doctrine. Those are two entirely different things.
Of course I say and do non-neutral things online, as everyone does, but a regulatory czar over online speech has nothing to do with "net neutrality" requiring Comcast to allow me to access a competing video content provider like Hulu or a competing telephone service provider like Vonage.
——————He’s not talking about net neutrality, he’s talking about an online fairness doctrine.-—————
It’s the classic progressive word game that...........
You mean to tell me that you can’t see through this?
After the century of garbage that progressives have put americans through.
—————a regulatory czar over online speech has nothing to do with “net neutrality” requiring Comcast-——————
Read his writings. He cares nothing for comcast. That’s the ruse to...........
Man, we’ve had a full century of progressive garbage........
How come you can’t see through this? Really? No...... Really?
Is it simply because of the title?
Had they called it the “neutrality doctrine” for the internet, or called it “net fairness” so that the titles were a little closer, would that work?
I just........... I can’t believe this. I’m flabbergasted.
I mean, I could see their sales pitches working on your average ny slimes reader, but we’re freepers. Shouldn’t more of us be immune to this rebranding stuff?