To: mas cerveza por favor
"Consider the source" Do you mean the writings from Vatican II or the Pope? Those are the two sources Rosen mentioned. I'm sorry you didn't notice that since the Rabbi felt both were more authoritative than the archbishop in question. That was the point.
167 posted on
10/31/2010 7:12:10 AM PDT by
Rashputin
( Palin/DeMint 2012 (if you can find someone as good to run the Senate, that is))
To: Rashputin
Do you mean the writings from Vatican II or the Pope? Those are the two sources Rosen mentioned. I'm sorry you didn't notice that since the Rabbi felt both were more authoritative than the archbishop in question. That was the point. The invocation of Vatican II was clearly erroneous since it contains nothing to refute the archbishop. The rabbi did not cite any particular writings of the Pope and so really provided nothing more authoritative than his own opinion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson