Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vintage film shows woman holding what? [1928 cell phone?]
www.wnd.com ^ | 10/30/2010 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 10/30/2010 12:00:01 PM PDT by rxsid

"Vintage film shows woman holding what?
Filmmaker says he's 'stumped' by image he calls 1928 cell phone

Shades of the flux capacitor.

Millions of people have watched a video by a Belfast filmmaker who thinks he has discovered a "time traveler" walking and talking on a cell phone in behind-the-scenes footage of the 1928 opening of a Charlie Chaplin film.

"I was kind of stumped by what I saw," George Clarke says in his YouTube video, "I kept winding it back … and I couldn't explain this. Nobody can give me an explanation as to what it is."

The video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Y6a4T2tJaSU


[Edit: difficult to make this pic out until after you've seen the video]

He said the film appears to show a "thin black device that is held to your ear." He said the knuckles are "bent in the flat shape of a phone.""

Continued: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=221357

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 1928; cellphone; chaplin; repost; timetravler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: rxsid

Did they have transistor radios back then?


41 posted on 10/30/2010 12:27:26 PM PDT by Yaelle (We need Comprehensive Congress Reform!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

42 posted on 10/30/2010 12:27:55 PM PDT by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

“hearing aid’
It certainly appeared that way to me.


43 posted on 10/30/2010 12:29:52 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kimmie7
"From the comments on youtube: Apparently the womans name was audrey manningham, she was 62 when this film was shot, she suffered from dementia and constantly talked to herself,, she was re fixing a comb she had in her hair at the time, the man who walks in front of her was George Manningham her husband."

re Fixing a comb in her hair...under the hat?

As others have stated, it's almost certainly an early listening device, and "who" she is talking to, is actually herself...explained with what you note was that she suffered from dementia and constantly talked to herself.

Maybe, she was "hearing" herself talk! haha.

44 posted on 10/30/2010 12:30:40 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

That is not a “woman”. Man feet, man hands, a very angular and masculine face. “Time traveler”? Physics does not disallow such things. Anyway, could be some sort of walkie-talkie. At the end, the figure seemed surprised by being filmed.


45 posted on 10/30/2010 12:34:05 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

FDR wasn’t elected for five more years so she’s not listening to him. Maybe its a crystal set of some sort and she is singing along with the music? Maybe its a hearing aid? maybe she got hit on the side of the head and its an ice bag?


46 posted on 10/30/2010 12:36:25 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Again? It’s a frickin’ hearing aid.


47 posted on 10/30/2010 12:37:04 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
LOL. Yup
48 posted on 10/30/2010 12:40:06 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Oh, jeez, it is a “cellphone”, except they were not called “cellphones” at the time.


49 posted on 10/30/2010 12:40:38 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
People who are hard of hearing are frequently surprised.

It's not a radio ~ it's simply a hearing aid. Look up Hearing Aid History and look at Images.

Clue, the standardized small battery had already hit the market. The telephone had been in place for decades. There's nothing in a hearing aid that had not yet been invented.

An alternative is that it could have been a wire recorder placed in a custom built handcase.

50 posted on 10/30/2010 12:40:53 PM PDT by muawiyah ("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Way too early in time to be a transistor radio (circa early 1950’s technology). I thought it could be some early miniature music box but hearing aid seems more plausible. Perhaps there was music playing in the streets or she could have been just singing in her head. Possibly a bit of a nutty old woman—it happens!


51 posted on 10/30/2010 12:42:49 PM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

sea shell


52 posted on 10/30/2010 12:47:21 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

That device is not wireless, nor is it square and small. The Siemens device looks more like a round singular headset headphone, connected by wire to a large purse.

Of course, if time travel is happening today, wouldn’t Siemens be a prime candidate for having access to developing that technology? Hence they could covering their tracks is just so many parallel universes and who would be the wiser.


53 posted on 10/30/2010 12:48:25 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

It is very interesting, could she have just been crazy?


54 posted on 10/30/2010 12:48:53 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Since this whole fuss is over possible evidence of time travel, why stop at a cell phone?

Did you see her hat?

Maybe it's not really a hat, but a time travel helmet from the year 2315, after the interplanetary conference gave them out as souvenirs.

55 posted on 10/30/2010 12:50:43 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
thats a she? lol it's a he holding ear warmer and hes pissed it aint working right so he's cursing the ear warmer! wheres my prize????????
56 posted on 10/30/2010 12:53:31 PM PDT by FreeperDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
I thought about walkie-talkie, but just recall how small walkie-talkies were during Korea-Vietnam era?


57 posted on 10/30/2010 12:56:30 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Did they have transistor radios back then?

The transistor wasn't invented until 1947.

58 posted on 10/30/2010 12:58:06 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

59 posted on 10/30/2010 12:59:33 PM PDT by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

C’mon, 2315 time travel devices were much smaller devices than a hat. Besides, just think of the history of the cell phone. Even the black Razors have been relatively short lived. If it were a communication device and time travel involved, it is probably something different than our cell phones today.

Notice how she fades away when she looks at the camera, as if somebody is fading out the scene into another, to cover up the evidence, so THEY won’t catch it?

But now that we know, why aren’t THEY returning to keep it out of the movie, so we don’t find out about it???? /s <;^)


60 posted on 10/30/2010 1:03:09 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson