[DoughtyOne]

Thanks. Glad to be reminded I’m not the only one with questions about this.

You raised a good point regarding the selection committee being answerable to the public (actually in this instance, they not being answerable).

I believe you’re right, we’ll just pretty much have to wait and see how this plays out. I hope it achieves it’s goal.

I also agree with the seeming conflict of sorts, with regard to the redistricting process for Congressional and other California politicians. It is too bad both the state and national party players couldn’t be governed by the same process. Perhaps this is a fix for a later date, if the in-state portion IS fixed by this.

I did look up the state info on the commission selection process.

If you like, it’s here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2617292/posts?page=40#40

[calcowgirl]

It is too bad both the state and national party players couldn’t be governed by the same process.

Yep -- that is what this proposition accomplishes. It makes it the same process, overseen by the same commission.

I did look up the state info on the commission selection process.

I saw that. Thanks.