To: LibWhacker
LOL - I am glad McClintock agrees with me on all these... This is how I am voting...
3 posted on
10/29/2010 1:11:08 PM PDT by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: BigEdLB
Prop 25: Out of the Frying Pan and Into the Fire. NO. This changes the 2/3 vote requirement for the state budget to a simple majority a reform I have long supported. Experience has shown that the current 2/3 vote requirement for the budget does not restrain spending and it utterly blurs accountability. But such a reform MUST repair the 2/3 vote requirement for all tax increases and restore constitutional spending and borrowing limits. Without these provisions, Prop. 25 would be a disaster for taxpayers and a recipe for bankruptcy. What the heck is he saying there? Does he believe in majority rule or does he believe in a need for 2/3? He says the 2/3 requirement does not restrain spending and "blurs accountability." So, if he's against the 2/3 requirement, is he in favor of 50%, which would be a Yes on 25 vote?
To: BigEdLB
I got his list last. I’m voting exactly this way.
25 posted on
10/29/2010 4:23:50 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: BigEdLB
Sigh.
It should have read, “I got his list last week. Im voting exactly this way”.
28 posted on
10/29/2010 4:25:39 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson