Skip to comments.
Congresswoman Accuses Teaparty Of Inciting Hate for Exposing Her "Under God" Omission From Pledge
ChicoER ^
| 10/28/10
| Chuck Wolk
Posted on 10/29/2010 12:55:58 PM PDT by Tom Hawks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
This lady needs major exposing to take her down. From what i understand the local television stations will not touch this and neither will the local rags. So we need to email this to any everyone we know in her area. Teresa Collett needs a lot of help. The pollsters are not even running polls because they don't think Teresa has a chance. I want to know how do they know she has no chance if they refuse to do any polling in her district.
1
posted on
10/29/2010 12:56:00 PM PDT
by
Tom Hawks
To: Tom Hawks
If she hasn’t broken the law maybe this one isn’t such a catastrophe. She didn’t force others to do the same thing as in not allowing the pledge at a meeting.
Just sayin’. YMMV.
2
posted on
10/29/2010 12:59:18 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: Tom Hawks
I love her arrogant comment, “...conservatives like me...”
She should go on that view show and then she could use the ‘b-word’ in public to as a term of endearment....
All these people need to go. (I hear that Yemen is a fine place for freaks like her)
3
posted on
10/29/2010 1:02:29 PM PDT
by
redshawk
(Hey 0Dumbo, I'm scratching my nose too, and not with my index finger!)
To: Tom Hawks
If McCollum doesn't like God, He will deal with her.
It's not for me to judge, however, but it seems that anyone who accuses someone of hate speech, etc, etc, ad nauseum when it is clearly NOT TRUE, is probably not really a Christian.
4
posted on
10/29/2010 1:14:15 PM PDT
by
PATRIOT1876
(Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
To: paulycy
Well, we don’t have to vote for her. No law breaking for that, either.
5
posted on
10/29/2010 1:14:26 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: CodeToad
6
posted on
10/29/2010 1:15:52 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: Tom Hawks
Congresswoman condemns radical right-wing agenda of hate, intolerance and racism
"Now I'm sure I hate her."
7
posted on
10/29/2010 1:33:50 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
To: paulycy
8
posted on
10/29/2010 1:38:00 PM PDT
by
DWC
(historian)
To: DWC
If it’s not clear then ignore it. That’s my advice.
9
posted on
10/29/2010 1:40:01 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: paulycy
She’s wanting the force of law brought down on those who are talking truthfully about her actions.
Somehow, people seem to miss that telling the truth about someone or something or some behavior
is not in any way the same as criminalizing it or of bringing legal sanction against it.
10
posted on
10/29/2010 1:40:36 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Tom Hawks
Anytime a leftist is exposed as a LEFTIST, he/she IMMEDIATELY claims to have been the victim of an ATTACK!!
To: Tom Hawks
Everyone is to blame but me defense is the only things liberals can do.
12
posted on
10/29/2010 1:48:40 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(It is Satan's fault)
To: Tom Hawks
Nice work on posting the story, complete with all the links to the evidence!
13
posted on
10/29/2010 1:50:38 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
To: paulycy
If she hasnt broken the law maybe this one isnt such a catastrophe. She didnt force others to do the same thing as in not allowing the pledge at a meeting. It sounds like she DID break the law. If her staff was using her congressional office equipment and e-mail to campaign by posting on these blog sites, that would be a violation of federal law.
To: Tom Hawks; MrB; DWC
So now we have a United States Congresswoman's campaign staff using official government equipment to attack citizens while doing damage control. 1. I'm sorry that I responded to this post without giving it the full concentration it deserved.
2.I would not vote for someone who treated the pledge this way.
3.If someone is misusing government equipment they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Once again I truly did NOT mean to cause any controversy. I hate arguing with fellow conservatives and I really stepped in it this time. I try my best to battle only with libs and trolls. Warmest Regards -pc :0)
15
posted on
10/29/2010 1:52:27 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: CA Conservative
It sounds like she DID break the law.Yes, you are right and I clarified my position above.
16
posted on
10/29/2010 1:56:34 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: Tom Hawks
Is using the computers in her office like that akin to what Miller got in trouble for in Alaska? No legal mind here,just asking.
17
posted on
10/29/2010 2:00:43 PM PDT
by
wiggen
(The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
To: Tom Hawks
McGollum is a bitter note clinger. She can’t speak without script.
18
posted on
10/29/2010 2:26:17 PM PDT
by
WOBBLY BOB
( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
To: paulycy
So now we have a United States Congresswoman's campaign staff using official government equipment to attack citizens while doing damage control.
- 1.) I'm sorry that I responded to this post without giving it the full concentration it deserved.
- 2.) I would not vote for someone who treated the pledge this way.
- 3.) If someone is misusing government equipment they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Once again I truly did NOT mean to cause any controversy. I hate arguing with fellow conservatives and I really stepped in it this time. I try my best to battle only with libs and trolls. Warmest Regards -pc :0)
Don't sweat it. We have all been in similar situations before. But thanks anyway. It is a mark of a good man it is a mark of a good man when one admits publicly he is wrong.
Take care FRiend
To: PATRIOT1876
it seems that anyone who accuses someone of hate speech, etc, etc, ad nauseum when it is clearly NOT TRUE, is probably not really a Christian.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson