Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

Ok. I’m confused about how this is going to help.

Isn’t Lisa Murkowski a ‘write in’ candidate?

Her name won’t be listed on the ballot, so having 100 Lisa’s wouldn’t make any difference. Especially if people don’t know who the other “Lisa’s” are.


9 posted on 10/29/2010 9:08:10 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2
Her name won’t be listed on the ballot, so having 100 Lisa’s wouldn’t make any difference. Especially if people don’t know who the other “Lisa’s” are.

But now she will not be able to say any write-in name that starts with an M is a vote for the heiress to the senate.
21 posted on 10/29/2010 9:14:58 AM PDT by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Bigh4u2

“Her name won’t be listed on the ballot, so having 100 Lisa’s wouldn’t make any difference. Especially if people don’t know who the other “Lisa’s” are”

The spoiled princess wants a list of write-ins at the polling places so people can see who the write-in candidates are, specifically her name. She had to take it to court because this isn’t supposed to happen. She got her way, making some people angry so they are making it harder for anyone asking for the list to find her name and it may make it harder for them to call mis-spellings for her since other names may be close to hers.


49 posted on 10/29/2010 10:03:30 AM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson