Skip to comments.
The New York Times Has A New Unhappy Distinction
Business Insider ^
| October 28, 2010
| Joe Weisenthal
Posted on 10/28/2010 12:56:07 PM PDT by redfog
According to CNBC, the New York Times is now the smallest company in the S&P 500, clocking in with a $1.11 billion market cap.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: blog; brakingnews; newyorktimes; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Too bad, so sad....
1
posted on
10/28/2010 12:56:10 PM PDT
by
redfog
To: redfog
2
posted on
10/28/2010 12:57:23 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
To: redfog
The incredible shrinking liberal newspaper!
3
posted on
10/28/2010 12:59:52 PM PDT
by
mojito
To: redfog
Given NYT stock trajectory unless S&P has political reasons for keeping them in the index then they’ll soon be booted.
If that happens then mutual funds that mirror the S&P500 will need to unload NYT, further pushing it down.
4
posted on
10/28/2010 1:00:01 PM PDT
by
Uncledave
To: redfog
In 2002 they had a $7 billion market capitalization.
Pinch has managed to destroy about 85% of the shareholders' value.
Lucky for him he cannot be fired.
5
posted on
10/28/2010 1:03:14 PM PDT
by
wideawake
To: mojito
The Slimes bought the Boston Globe in the early 1990s for just about that amount.
To: Uncledave
The thing that amazes me is that no large stockholder has filed a class action against the Sulzbergers for dereliction of fiduciary duty. They own all the voting stock and I don't think it would take the most brilliant lawyer to show that Putz Sulz's use of the paper for his own political agenda has been fiscally irresponsible and a direct cause of the loss of stock value.
But, you would have to find a lawyer and with the professional courtesy among bottom-dwelling mud suckers, that could be hard.
7
posted on
10/28/2010 1:07:30 PM PDT
by
In Maryland
("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
To: redfog
8
posted on
10/28/2010 1:09:01 PM PDT
by
stylecouncilor
(What Would Jim Thompson Do?)
To: redfog
Heh. They’ll end up like Newsweek. Sold for $1.
To: redfog
In spite of this, the left wing controlled mutual funds are probably still holding on to NYT stock to help keep it afloat as they have with other left wing mediot companies.
Sticking it to those with 401ks and IRAs to keep their left wing socialist mediot friends afloat.
10
posted on
10/28/2010 1:12:34 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
To: redfog
Do any Freepers know if this S&P guideline includes all stock or just the stock that is regularly traded. The reason I ask is that the voting stock is closely held by the Sulzburger (sp?) family.
11
posted on
10/28/2010 1:12:34 PM PDT
by
Mobties
(Let the markets work! Reduce the government footprint!)
To: redfog
12
posted on
10/28/2010 1:13:09 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Mobties
It is the non voting stock owned by stupid outsiders.
13
posted on
10/28/2010 1:13:46 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
To: redfog

Traitorous commie bastards.
14
posted on
10/28/2010 1:15:46 PM PDT
by
RingerSIX
(Better dead than red.)
To: redfog
On the bright side, they are soon to be the largest company not in the S&P 500.
15
posted on
10/28/2010 1:17:03 PM PDT
by
Defiant
(I'm a Fabian Constitutionalist. Roll back FDR and progressivism!)
To: November 2010
How much did that Mexican billionaire put into this company?
16
posted on
10/28/2010 1:19:13 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: Uncledave
Isn’t there a very close correlation between being kicked off the S&P 500 and then being bought-out or bankrupt within a very short amount of time? I can’t seem to find that statistic.
With NY Times, we can only hope
17
posted on
10/28/2010 1:19:37 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Grampa Dave
Really! Hmm. I wonder which is worse, the NYT company or the knuckleheads who own its non-voting, no dividend common stock with a DNR tag on its chart.
Thanks, Dave. BTW How are the grandkids?
18
posted on
10/28/2010 1:20:35 PM PDT
by
Mobties
(Let the markets work! Reduce the government footprint!)
To: GeronL
To: Mobties
Important things first. The GrandKids are doing great.
I have been trying to alert people owing mutual funds that own large amounts of the non voting/dividend stock, their money is being used to this enemy of America, the NY Slimes alive.
Below is a link to the major holders of NY Slimes stock:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=NYT+Major+Holders
20
posted on
10/28/2010 1:25:27 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson