Posted on 10/28/2010 5:49:03 AM PDT by randita
democrat fraud going to be like a f*rt in a hurricane this time
55 is very low. More like 70.
Sabato is cautious. He is not a right-wing ideologue. His numbers are the absolute minimum that we can expect.
Since Larry the wig second source of income comes from Demmies, my guess is he is lowballing to insure continued cash flow from dead Demmies who still think they have a chance. Just my opinion. Larry is a sleezeball Dem here in VA.
Way to low. We are going to do much better than what he is predicating.
WHEN AMERICA IS NOT AMERICA ANY MORE
Dr. David Janda explains rationing (obamacare)
Listen to Krauthammer on Omamacare impact on the USA, (you have to put up with the commercial)
Sabato is cautious. He is not a right-wing ideologue. His numbers are the absolute minimum that we can expect.
**********************
What interested me was that despite a relatively modest Republican gain in the house, he projects what is pretty much an optimum figure for the xenate. Senators are hard to take down.
They did field a good candidate in O’Donnell, she saved us from Castle.
Ah but they despise Regnantons there which is why Patrick set up Cahill... to tap off votes from Charlie Baker. I fear Cadillac Duval will win with a plurality.
One loss I think the GOP will have in CA gov. Not that Arnold was really a GOP, but I can’t see Meg Whitman pulling this off. I really thought she was a pretty good candidate for CA.
I do think Carly will squeek out a win... I hope.
The potential for an Iraq like election where 85% of the adult voting age public goes to the polls is always a possibility.
If the American people are angry enough at how they are being lied to by MaObama, the Democrats and the Media, particularly, they see the real truth about this economy, it will be Democrat road kill. This thing has the potential to set a new historical record.
Si why do the MSM’s ABCNNBCBS not see this? Why are they not “expecting” 50-60 repubbie house seats, and laughing at Pelosi’s propaganda?
8<)
Dick *head* Durbin might disagree with schuck replacing Reid
You obviously have a higher opinion of him than I do here in the Commonwealth.
If Obama continues to campaign it could go up substantially. He has a reverse effect on this election. When he tries to stir up his base, the right becomes more aroused.
I hope he is on the low side. I’d really like to see the Senate go Republican.
Anyone see Drudge’s report on the Gallup poll? 55% are vote or lean Republican—the HIGHEST for any party since before 1992.
If this holds, it’ll truly be a tidal wave—and we could see Coons and Boxer and Murray go overboard as well.
Pray, work, vote.
From your lips to God’s ears.
Linda Muclusky or whatever her name is, will lose in AK.
If we can get 9 in the Senate, I expect to see a demonrat “Jumping Jim Jeffords” by March of 2011. Rats hate to have little power, and a ‘jumper’ will gain tons of it.
55 in the House is probably near the bottom of what is likely. My view is that 50 is the floor.
I think that 60 is more likely than 55, but probably also a little more likely than 70.
However, if Republican-leaning voters are as fired up as some polls suggest, 80 or 90 wouldn’t be surprising.
I’m betting 55 - 65. My younger son says 70 is the floor. My older son says, well, if the Republicans weren’t the stupid party, they’d get 70, so they’ll likely only get 50. I point out that if the Republicans weren’t the stupid party, they’d get 100+.
In the Senate - I’m still hoping for 9 or 10, but 8 may be more realistic.
Governorships - Haven’t followed them at all closely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.