Hmmm, the schools are dependent on government money and the students are dependent on government money... What could possibly be the goal?
Let's see if I have this right - the cost of college continues to go up because there is more money available. There is no significant increase in quality of education; in fact, the quality may actually be going down.
Could I change the above to read:
Let's see if I have this right - the cost of government continues to go up because there is more money available. There is no significant increase in quality of government; in fact, the quality may actually be going down.
Any reason why we shouldn't reduce the availability of money to both institutions? PS. I support the recent push to have some colleges prove that they actually help their graduates find jobs with meaningful wages. But, I want that concept spread to all colleges and to exclude teaching at other colleges as "meaningful employment".