Posted on 10/27/2010 6:20:03 PM PDT by RobinMasters
We knew that way before the election but people would not listen to us.
Make him pee in a cup one sunday morning after partying..........
Don’t get my hopes up doggone it!
Don’t get my hopes up doggone it!
You know, for all the horrible horrible things Obama has done to our country already, I am beginning to think we miraculously dodged a bullet. Just imagine what he would have done if he had been even remotely competent and his status as messiah would have endured.
I’m starting to warm up to those mullahs.
Possibly! I can see Congress doing this instead of the right reason(s).
Historical precedent: Clinton was impeached over perjury and sex. He should have been impeached over his national security breaches and sales of classified technology.
It won’t be via the BC issue.
Too many from both sides are (allegedly) guilty of knowing the truth.
Competent, no.
But then, Biden doesn't care if the whole world thinks he's incompetent. He assumes it's obvious.
I agree. We have to pay him anyway, so he can just buckle down and do some of the real duties of being President. Let him show whether he's a man, and can do the job, or whether he's just been a balloon full of hot air.
What’s the odds that Michelle divorces him if he decides not to run for another term?
That means michelle has access, too. And probably quite of few of the genuine filth he surrounds himself with as advisors and czars (oh puke). This is the first time I have ever given pause to this truth. Interesting fodder for thought. And scary.
It is amazingly insane that Iran would even speak out on him. Obie needs to have a beer party with them.
Neither do the Democrats.
From an Iranian perspective, perhaps it is better. Talk about an incompetent and fumbled middle eastern policy!
I see no particular reason why Obama, even if broken by the job and in depression, would need to be removed. He won’t be a troublemaker; he’d do what he already does today - nothing in particular.
Now, the country needs the President on occasion, as a figurehead. I’m sure Obama should be capable of welcoming ambassadors or visiting heads of state. Everything else can be done by others, as long as he buys a reliable signature stamp.
Removal of Obama would be, for (D)’s, a disaster on all fronts, there is no need to elaborate. But it is perfectly doable to keep Obama in the shadow, for presentation purposes only. Someone else, sufficiently capable, has to be found to make decisions, though - and Obama has no such people around him. Probably he had no idea what the presidenting is about. I recall that Hillary was quite enthusiastic about those “3am calls”, so why doesn’t she lend a hand if she is that good?
Not only it would be politically unwise to remove Obama, it would be also hard to do technically. Bad presidents are not removable; only insane ones are. But are we dealing here with an insane man (like NK’s beloved Kim) or with a tired, burned out man who found himself in a wrong job? I think the latter is more correct. Removal by coercing him to resign is not much better than forced removal - it still conveys the message that the party made a big mistake; and it will have to pay for that too.
this is interesting, because there is a lot of political shennanigans going on in Iraq
This article serves as a warning that they’d better watch out that a President Palin might be less friendly to them than a president Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.