Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay marriage is to be the public expression of a powerful new norm
Australian Conservative ^ | 26 October, 2010 | Q & A: Ben-Peter Terpstra and Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 10/26/2010 3:25:12 PM PDT by AustralianConservative

Equality is the state religion. If equality demands we accept that there is no difference between same-sex and opposite sex relationships, then people who cannot accept that, who do not believe it is true, will become second-class citizens – tolerated perhaps, but only in a marginalised and stigmatised way.

We are already seeing the engine of state power being used to exclude traditional religious believers, especially from posts of cultural power – in the U.S. for example, graduate schools are now kicking out counselling students who say they cannot help gay couples maintain their relationships. They are willing to refer politely such couples to others – but that’s not good enough. “Discriminators” cannot be marriage counsellors. In England, courts are beginning to rule that Christians cannot foster or adopt children – because they might be gay and that might be bad for them. (Never mind the abundance of evidence that religion is in fact good for children).

(Excerpt) Read more at australianconservative.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; maggiegallagher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: AustralianConservative

I suppose it could happen, but such a society would not last very long.


21 posted on 10/26/2010 4:28:58 PM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise
I heard Dennis Prager give probably one of the most sensical comments about this than ever. Essentially, God would not have designed the organ that is designed to bring forth life via its seed to be enjoined with the organ that is essentially an organ of death. What comes out of the anus is, obviously, the waste of the human body.

Thanks for posting that.

That Dennis Prager has a beautiful mind. I wonder if he writes poetry. :)

22 posted on 10/26/2010 4:33:56 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Homosexual relationships already take children away from their mothers (in the case of a male couple) and their fathers (in the case of lesbians). That the pro-homosexual marriage crowd doesn’t admit to this is either due to extreme denial or serious heartlessness.


23 posted on 10/26/2010 5:01:51 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick
My neighbor, who is a graduate student in epidemiology/public health, and--- FWIW--- not a Christian --- says that the mixture of oral, anal, and urinary tract microbes, as happens with people who engage in rectal penetration and other such crapulous practices, maximizes transmission of infectious conditions which he describes as "zooey".

By the way, this isn't "anti-gay": it works that way for heterosexual couples who practice anal and oral copulation, too.

Eh, count me out. :o/

24 posted on 10/26/2010 5:08:07 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (In theory. there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is. -Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

Walt, I’m not sure if you were joking or not. Dennis Prager is a religious Jew. I have been listening to his radio program for about 7 or 8 years now. He is very knowledgeable about the Jewish faith and I have really learned a lot.


25 posted on 10/26/2010 5:52:54 PM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise
Does Dennis Prager really talk like that on the radio -

when he knows kids could be listening?

26 posted on 10/26/2010 6:13:30 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

True. In the U.S. our laws are based on the laws of nature and God’s Laws—that is specifically written in the Declaration of Independence. It is there because the Founders adopted John Locke’s Theories who read Cicero who had stated that laws that go against Natural Law and God’s Law are unjust.

This idea of the pursuit of happiness is tied into the nature of man—that need for private property and biological relationships and those laws apply to the natural family—that a baby has the natural right to be raised by his biological parents is known to protect him in the best way possible from emotional and physical abuse.

That said, Marxism, of course, denies the nature of man and states it as evolving—always changing. Locke and the Founders said NO—the nature of man has never ever changed in the 2000 years of history they fervently studied.

Of course, Marxists don’t want you to understand and know history because then they can lie about everything and make such idiotic claims that homosexual behavior is genetic and not a fluid lifestyle—which has been always more connected to pagan orgies and no sexual restraint and pederasty.

It was the Jewish religion that developed the religious aspect of marriage first and sexual sin and which the Catholic Church continued. Aquinas aligned Catholic Theology to Natural Law Theory so fine tuned it to logic, reason and science to raise up the value of women in societies which give them worth which is unique in history—as the Christian religion always has made even the least among us, including lepers, have worth.

Catholic Theology directly led to rigorous intellectual studies and led directly to Copernicus, Gallileo and Newton and Keppler. Christian ideology which was based on Aquinas Natural Law Theory was also very compatible with scientific knowledge and this all led to the Enlightenment and all the greatest literature, like Milton, Dostoevsky Shakespeare, etc.

Christian ideas in Western Civ is what created individualism and gave us a system of government that has given rights to minorities and women like no other nation on the face of the earth. The Protestant Christian ethic made economics here the most successful on earth because of the industriousness and trust and character that was promoted by the culture and majority of the people.

Perfect no, but more perfect than anything ever in history.


27 posted on 10/26/2010 6:27:56 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

>>> then people who cannot accept that, who do not believe it is true, will become second-class citizens – tolerated perhaps, but only in a marginalised and stigmatised way.

Seems overstated. That would as easily describe people who don’t bathe.


28 posted on 10/26/2010 6:57:24 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

...”Of course, Marxists don’t want you to understand and know history because then they can lie about everything”...

That’s why I am so thankful for the home school movement. Publik skool kids might not learn real history, but I know what you are talking about... not because I went to publik skool when I was a kid (learned practically NOTHING about history), but because I home school and have learned it all along with my son! Just read a book about Copernicus today... and Thomas Aquinas, wow! If only all children could receive a quality education. But then the Marxists would have one leg of their stool taken from them ;)


29 posted on 10/26/2010 7:19:13 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

I sent my kids to Catholic schools for the most part, but they still had lay teachers and some of the books were ones used in public schools. Some teachers were better than others and as my five went through the system, the great teachers would be gone by the time my youngest was there :(

Individual teachers really determine the worth of the school year for the most part but there was always some decent content in the classes, and no discipline problems.

I homeschooled for a year. The curricula was the best I have ever seen. I even incorporated Latin I. It was made so easy to teach, I was amazed. Translating long sentences by the end of the year. Only had school 3 hours—five days a week but read great literature and did extravagant oil paintings, paper mache projects, diagramming sentences, etc.

Now adays I would NEVER send my child to a public school nor most private schools. I would homeschool. The moral relativism and revisionist history is too pervasive.


30 posted on 10/26/2010 7:39:41 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

My two older sons went to a private Christian school. Pretty much what you described... They used public school text books, too. Basically, we paid LOTS of money for an ok education.

Home schooling is a gift from God for us. My son, (and I) are learning Latin, too! Classical education enables you to form a solid foundation.. a “peg” on which to hang future information (and to use to form future logic).


31 posted on 10/26/2010 7:52:31 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

I was educated in Catholic schools when they still had nuns and Latin and diagramming. I had an excellent foundation—lots of logic— but the Church was starting to lose its confidence because of separation of Church and State and aggressive silencing and ridicule in the public square. The CC quit monitoring the movies which they strickly critiqued so that immoral ideas wouldn’t be transmitted to children. That ended in the later 60’s. They didn’t have any legal power, but the CC controlled public opinion enough that studios listened.

That was the start of the outright persecution of Christianity by the State by Progressives to destroy it. Of course, Marxists were infiltrating the Church to create these “Christian” Liberation Theology Churches to get control over South American and Latin America. Marcuse and everyone knew that the Catholic Church was too powerful for them to create socialism unless they perverted the religion and used the religion to create the collective—collective salvation.

Then, of course, the APA took homosexuality off of the mentally ill list and that forced the Church to treat gays as normal people who just strayed, instead of being inherently disordered and damaged. The Church was damned if they treated homosexuals too harshly (un-PC) and then, we saw what happened by only requiring counseling. The infiltration of the Church by homosexuals who can’t control their base urges even when it comes to children has done great harm to the Catholic Church.


32 posted on 10/26/2010 8:13:36 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: trisham

It forces us to be a participant.


33 posted on 10/26/2010 8:36:08 PM PDT by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Thanks... I’ve learned a lot tonight. I had no idea who Marcuse was (excuse me while I vomit). I do know about the DSM that declassified homosexuality as a disorder in ‘73 (yet now maintains “homo-phobia” ((a made up affliction)) as a disorder in the DSM-IV.

I am not a Catholic, but I have great respect for the Church. She is a great cornerstone of God’s presence in this world.


34 posted on 10/26/2010 9:10:07 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tlb

That’s already happening in some cases and in some countries.


35 posted on 10/27/2010 1:34:48 AM PDT by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Glad we have people like Maggie. And remember many of Obama’s voters might vote Democrat but they oppose “gay marriage” as the Californian experience testifies. Many black voters have rescued the institution of marriage there.


36 posted on 10/27/2010 1:39:46 AM PDT by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

Excellent point – and well made. I can tell you care for children.


37 posted on 10/27/2010 1:41:22 AM PDT by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tlb
You probably don't know how revealing your statement is, but we noticed. You're now equating people who believe marriage is what it has always been to people with poor hygiene.
38 posted on 10/27/2010 5:09:20 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson