Posted on 10/26/2010 10:05:08 AM PDT by MarkLevinFan
The People of Delaware have apparently decided they won't be electing a Christian woman to the US Senate.
This is coming as good news to members of the Communist International. Around the world there is unbridled excitement for Chris Coons among hardline Marxists.
There is good reason too. Coons would hold the highest elected office ever for a self-described bearded Marxist in the United States. The Communist International, while appreciating President Obama as a step in a good direction, views him as more of a social democrat in the European tradition.
So anticipation continues to build among Communist hardliners for a Coons victory since he's widely viewed as a Communist in the Maoist/Stalinist vein.
The Communist International espouses old school hardline control and often uses environmental issues as a means to achieve their goals. They also believe American children need to be "reprogrammed" in order to see the government as their true family.
For his part, Coons is already legendary among the Communist International and is already inspiring hardliners to seek office here in the US and around the world.
One leading French Communist recently remarked that " we always viewed America as an obstacle to the workers paradise. Now the day has arrived where they are leading the way. This peasant woman (Christine O'Donnell) and her anti-worker, Christian views, would not be tolerated under a Stalinist paradise. Besides, peoples revolution is a man's business".
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
How could anyone in their right mind vote for this guy?
They aren't. They're voting against Christine O'Donnell.
No. It doesn't.
In some brain-dead states in America, the majority of people can't wait to take their chains.
I disagree. Do we forget what state we are talking about here. It is Vermont light. The fact that COD is even mildly competitive at points is amazing.
DE default voting instincts is Coons style liberalism/statism.
Just like France? Heck, even Cuba is going capitalist.
Some by choice, some by fraud. I have always said this election will be won or lost by fraud.
The Republicans are part and partial to it, else explain their abject silence on the issue.
Remember B 1 Bomber Bob
Let’s encourage the Guardian readers of Great Britain to contact voters in Delaware and plead with them to vote for Coons. O’Donnell would then pull it out in a landslide.
They’ll be voting FOR Christine and AGAINST Coons.
Delaware doesn’t have a lot of Conservatives. Only Hawaii has fewer. It does have a lot of Moderates. Only Hawaii has more. A lot of states have more liberals than Delaware does.
29 - Conservative
47 - Moderate
21 - Liberal
They aren't. They're voting against Christine O'Donnell.
You're avoiding the question.
You're answer is valid only if Coons is better than O'Donnell.
Certainly, I would hope you don't think that.
I'll rephrase the posters question for you so we can avoid the confusion.
How could anyone in their right mind think that Coons is better than O'Donnell?
You can automatically move most of these Mod people to the Lib column. Just look at their voting habits. They may be Moderate by DE standards but they are solid left by all red states and even some blue.
HI is also a collapsing welfare state. I think the Repub Gov backed Obummer thats how lib that place is.
Disagree. Delaware went for Reagan in 84 with around 60%.
Those are moderates voting for a Conservative.
All those moderates means that the bases are really small.
29 - for the Republican
21 - for the Democrat
47 - up for grabs.
1984? Lets see. Algore was a pro-life conservative Dim. So was Clinton. Mondale was more moderate than Obummer and he couldn’t win anything. That was 26 years ago. One of my cars is a 1984 Olds Custom Cruiser. I take it to collector car shows now and it has an historic plate. That is nothing to point to.
Lets look since ‘92. Every Pres. election went to the Rat. Locally Bill Roth was the last Repub for Senate and he was liberal and he won for name recognition mostly since the late ‘60’s. Carper beat him and he was a Lib. Castle was an official RINO. There has never been a solid right winger running or winning since COD.
Bill Roth was a supply-sider.
People in the Northeast (Wilmington is basically a Philly suburb) don’t like Cowboys. That’s what people in the Northeast thought of W. Bush. Subtract that, and you get a state that votes with the winner.
You could, if you like, argue that the Moderates in Delaware vote more frequently for the Democrat than the Republican.
Maybe they aren’t particularly political and vote for the candidate whose style they prefer. Who knows?
We’ll see in a week.
I’m not about to give the blog a hit. Did the writer attribute his sources? An unnamed French Communist leader said blah blah blah. Communists around the world say blah blah blah. We wouldn’t accept that coming from the other side. Absent attribution, this story has the whiff of Janet Cooke.
>>This peasant woman (Christine O’Donnell) and her anti-worker, Christian views, would not be tolerated under a Stalinist paradise. Besides, peoples revolution is a man’s business”.<<
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE PLASTER THIS EVERYWHERE.
RATs/COMMS SHOWING THEIR TRUE FEELINGS - JUST LIKE THEY TREAT BLACKS, HISPANICS, ETC.
Excuse the CAPS, but I am really PO’ed. We can add “and then they came for the women, but I was alone”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.