Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA state appeals court throws out Keyes vs. Bowen - claims SoS & electors had no duty to vet Obama
AIPNews.com | Oct. 26, 2010 | Tom Hoefling

Posted on 10/26/2010 8:51:13 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

The AIP response to press inquiries this morning:

"We have always maintained that the burden of proof that he possesses the constitutionally required credentials to serve as President rests squarely on Mr. Obama and no one else. For a mere ten dollars, with Barack Obama's assent, the State of Hawaii can and will provide the American people with a copy of his actual long form birth certificate. The fact that Mr. Obama continues to be willing to expend large sums of money, including precious taxpayers' dollars, to prevent the public revelation of such a simple document, has raised serious legitimate questions in the minds of millions of Americans about his qualifications. This is extremely unhealthy for the country, and for the Presidency, to say the least. That's why we applaud the efforts of Alan Keyes and other America's Independent Party leaders in their persistent demand that Barack Obama produce the necessary documents to clear these questions from the public docket, and fervently hope that they will appeal this unwise decision by this particular court."
 
Tom Hoefling
Chairman, America's Independent Party
 
tomhoefling@gmail.com 

 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; US: California
KEYWORDS: certifigate; keyes; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: piytar

“Any investigation of eligibility is best left to each party, which presumably will conduct the appropriate background check or risk that its nominee’s election will be derailed by an objection in Congress”

So.. as long as your party is in the majority in Congress, there’s no need to worry if your candidate is eligible. Tell me again why what the “birthers” claim happened is too crazy to investigate?


41 posted on 10/26/2010 10:25:05 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mlo

“Courts aren’t in business to answer questions you’d like to know.”

It’s not a question we’d like to know, it’s a question that was required to be answered before this clown could take office. While many Americans are sitting here wondering, why it wasn’t answered at that time, everyone is pointing the finger at someone else, saying that they had no responsibility to get that answer. Well, someone certain did have this responsibility, even if nobody wants to stand up and take the blame now.


42 posted on 10/26/2010 10:30:39 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; null and void; EternalVigilance
Schwartzenegger 2012?

He would be perfect for what I've been saying for over a year!

When Arnold or any naturalized citizen is refused a place on the '12 ballot, as he/she should, the "injured" candidate will have "standing" to sue for ALL other candidates to prove NBC status, subject to forensic approval.

Could 0b0z0 even try, especially with Hillary in the wings? This is why I believe he won't dare try!

43 posted on 10/26/2010 10:38:50 AM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Thank you for your input, Mr. Obama.

That's Mrs. Obama ... mlo = Michelle LeVaughn Obama.

44 posted on 10/26/2010 12:17:19 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; EternalVigilance; frog in a pot

You must have seen this too about Moodie, when I posted this a couple days ago, on the long ongoing thread about Lt.Col. Lakin. Thank you!!!


45 posted on 10/26/2010 12:18:32 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: melancholy; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; ...
From the ruling .. blatant idiocy!!!

"Any investigation of eligibility is best left to each party, which presumably will conduct the appropriate background check or risk that its nominee’s election will be derailed by an objection in Congress, which is authorized to entertain and resolve the validity of objections following the submission of the electoral votes."

One page view of the ABOVE DOCUMENT

___________________________________________

WELL worth reading for what's behind the South Carolina 2008 certification

*************************

IF IT LOOKS LIKE A DUCK…

*snip*

The cast of characters in the South Carolina election scene reads like a ‘Who’s Who’ of Democratic politics. The Fowlers, Carol and Don, are as much a touchstone of the SC Democratic Party as are the Kennedys in Massachusetts.

Don is the former DNC Chair. Carol is the Chair of the SC Democratic Committee. Although married for only 3½ years, they have worked together in party politics for over 30 years.

Both are members of the DNC’s powerful Rules and Bylaws Committee; both were Super Delegates to the 2008 DNC Convention. In the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary election, Don claimed he supported HRC; his wife supported BO.

*snip*

Does the organization of the D party or, the laws of the state of SC authorize the Treasurer of the party to authenticate the eligibility of the names of the D candidates submitted to the Election Commission to be placed on the ballot?

These are only some of the questions appropriately asked in the context of a criminal investigation.

Rest HERE

46 posted on 10/26/2010 12:56:54 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

So we could put Mahmoud AhmadberdinnerJacket from Iran on the California presidential ballot. The CA SoS has no duty to vet him either.


47 posted on 10/26/2010 1:04:37 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Well they didn’t think much of Kreeps brief, did they? I’m not sure I like the part about “...the presidential nominating process is not subject to each of the 50 states’ election officials independently decising whether a presidential nominee is qualified, as this could lead to chaotic results.” It could also lead to any state laws requiring candidates present birth certificates being struck down. Fortunately this is a state court and not a federal one.


48 posted on 10/26/2010 1:06:04 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Another “suspicious decision” punting it to the SCOTUS.

California Supreme Court. It was a state court decision not a federal court one.

49 posted on 10/26/2010 1:07:55 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Contentless insult noted. Typical birther debating style. You don’t have facts or logic, so you call names.

You're lucky FR doesn't zot people for silly dingbatness. Many times those names are accurate descriptions.

50 posted on 10/26/2010 1:13:22 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; LucyT; rxsid
Another “suspicious decision” punting it to the SCOTUS.

That's why DeFazio is talking about impeachment papers against Justice Roberts and why they're attacking Justice Thomas.

51 posted on 10/26/2010 1:19:33 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: danamco
I've known about Moodie since I've known about the http://www.ballot-access.org piece on the Keyes lawsuit.

I was, however, reminded about it. Thanks.

52 posted on 10/26/2010 1:22:36 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I bet Badmood I’mademonnutjob would be happy to run for the US president and I’m sure there are enough nutcase jihad loving etcs to do all the paperwork.


53 posted on 10/26/2010 1:24:08 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Ya know, the funny thing.... the objections that were legally required to be asked for in Congress.... were never asked for. So this election has never been lawfully certified.

But this decision is total idiocy because the Constitution leaves the details of figuring out the elections TO THE STATES. Congress’ job is to count the electoral votes which come to them certified by the states. I can’t see as where the Constitution every authorizes Congress to override the rulings of the individual states. And the rulings of the individual states are done by their Secretary of State.

These judges are morons.


54 posted on 10/26/2010 1:32:51 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That is BS and that judge very likely knows it.

There is long record of SoS’ disallowing candidates.


55 posted on 10/26/2010 1:35:19 PM PDT by unspun (It's the Sovereignty, Stu... um... art. | WE ARE GULAG BOUND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; mlo; EternalVigilance

Mlo’s arguing for the perverted judiciary system that is reinstituting authoritarianism vs. the self-governance of the Sovereign People is not a particularly good move in FR.


56 posted on 10/26/2010 2:14:03 PM PDT by unspun (It's the Sovereignty, Stu... um... art. | WE ARE GULAG BOUND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I see they also ordered the plaintiff (Keyes et al) to pay court costs.


57 posted on 10/26/2010 2:51:02 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"We have always maintained that the burden of proof that he possesses the constitutionally required credentials to serve as President rests squarely on Mr. Obama and no one else."

And the court replies...

The trial court found that plaintiffs did not identify any ministerial duty that the President and Vice President failed to perform, and the petition did not seek any relief against them; thus, plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action against those defendants.

Birthers are asking for a do-over....and the court says nope.

58 posted on 10/26/2010 6:21:29 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Well, it looks like the court ruled that the Congress should have checked out his qualifications if there was a doubt (12th Amendment). Since Cheney and Pelosi shirked their obligations, we're stuck.

However, a lack of qualifications would be a sound basis for impeachment. Calling Speaker Boehner!!

59 posted on 10/26/2010 6:36:35 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Coming in late....I noticed the word “presumably” could also mean “assume”. And we all know what “assume” means.

Everyone wants to pass the buck and our country is left holding the bag. In this case the bag is full of BO.


60 posted on 10/26/2010 6:40:51 PM PDT by azishot (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson