Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whitman declares death penalty a litmus test for judicial nominees
Sacramento Bee ^ | 10/26/10 | David Siders

Posted on 10/26/2010 8:24:39 AM PDT by SmithL

WESTLAKE VILLAGE – Meg Whitman said Monday that if elected governor she would appoint only judges who support the death penalty.

The Republican candidate's remarks preceded a rally outside Los Angeles at which she told hundreds of supporters that Democrat Jerry Brown is "soft on crime" and that she will end his political career.

"One more week," Whitman told a cheering crowd at the Hyatt Westlake Plaza in Westlake Village. "One more week until we retire Jerry Brown permanently from politics."

Whitman, joined by crime victim advocates, told The Bee she would treat the death penalty as a litmus test when considering all judicial nominees. She criticized Brown, the former governor, for what she called his "long history of judges that were very liberal," in particular his controversial appointment of Rose Bird as the state's chief justice.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2010; cajudges; deathpenalty; goldenstate; jerrybrown; megwhitman; moonbeam; rosebird; whitman

1 posted on 10/26/2010 8:24:47 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

sounds good to me. If you ask me the death penalty should be expanded and waiting times should be cut by two thirds.


2 posted on 10/26/2010 9:09:49 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Forget Meg, Brown has the fix in with his commie rats.


3 posted on 10/26/2010 9:40:21 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul

The Death-penalty should also be applied to Supreme Court Justices who undermine the Constitution, IMO... as well as to judges and prosecutors who enforce contra-constitutional ‘laws’ and regulations.

Say what you will, but it’s already a prosecutable law w/ capital punishment*: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000241——000-.html

*Government false arrest, IMO, certainly qualifies as “kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap.”


4 posted on 10/26/2010 2:01:28 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson