Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. sells debt with a negative yield for 1st time
Reuters ^ | Oct 25, 2010 | Richard Leong

Posted on 10/25/2010 2:17:47 PM PDT by atomic_dog

The U.S. Treasury Department on Monday sold securities that fetched a negative yield for the first time, implying investors are willing to pay the government to own its debt.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: federalreserve; inflation
And so cometh inflation. Hang on, it's gonna be a bumpy rude.
1 posted on 10/25/2010 2:17:48 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Mod. Please delete. I searched on the word negative in the title and nothing showed up but yet it is a dupe. Sorry


2 posted on 10/25/2010 2:20:58 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog
implying investors are willing to pay the government to own its debt

That sorry state of affairs cannot possible last.

People invest in any instrument to make money. Not lose it. Sure, a few people will do a little of this to get the capital loss tax write off, but that'll be small potatoes.

3 posted on 10/25/2010 2:23:03 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

It’s Bush’s fault!!!


4 posted on 10/25/2010 2:26:13 PM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

What kind of idiot buys a security that is already losing money?

I have some things I would like to sell.


5 posted on 10/25/2010 2:33:36 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog
And so cometh inflation. Hang on, it's gonna be a bumpy rude.

You mean deflation? The only reason why you'd pay $102 so that you can get paid back $100 later is because you expect those future dollars to be worth more than they are today, and you have nowhere else to park your $100 safely.

6 posted on 10/25/2010 2:34:12 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1; atomic_dog
Either that, or investors are gambling the US is headed for significant deflation.
7 posted on 10/25/2010 2:34:53 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Never underestimate the power of government to distort markets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
What kind of idiot buys a security that is already losing money?

Just had a thought: The FED?

8 posted on 10/25/2010 2:35:06 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Beat me to it.


9 posted on 10/25/2010 2:35:39 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Never underestimate the power of government to distort markets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Horse puckey. These bonds were bought at a price that would make thier yeild negative at today’s inflation rate. The people that bought them expect inflation and expect to make money from owning them relative to other investments. It does show that they are willing to take a slight loss relative to inflation to find an inflation protected investment (I think they can’t make up for the -.55% even if inflation screams upward — they’ll always be a little behind inflation).


10 posted on 10/25/2010 2:37:43 PM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Fabulous, we get significant deflation when the Fed is gambling on inflation if the Fed is, indeed, buying Treasuries..ooops....


11 posted on 10/25/2010 2:38:33 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Never underestimate the power of government to distort markets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Inflation? Sounds one hell of a lot worse. This is pure insanity.


12 posted on 10/25/2010 3:09:56 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

An idiot who sees inflation coming. These are inflation indexed securities.


13 posted on 10/25/2010 3:11:47 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Boy I bet these sell like hotcakes!

Hollyweird liberals line up!!


14 posted on 10/25/2010 3:32:14 PM PDT by Mr. K (All our candidates suck! The media SAYS SO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: November 2010
The people that bought them expect inflation and expect to make money from owning them relative to other investments.

People aren't buying those bonds, the TBTF banks are. It safer, easier and less risky than lending money to businesses or individuals. After the elections the Fed will kick in QE2 and the TBTF banks will dump their trash at the Fed window and buy more bonds. At some points it explodes and there will hyperinflation the likes of which Weimar never saw. Don't be caught without a chair when this music stops.

15 posted on 10/25/2010 11:00:56 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

By the way, I don’t know if you noticed, but I think I was wrong above. If the inflation rate heats up people will probably pay a premium in the after market for these bonds, so the -.55% would be made up in an inflationary environment and the buyers of the bonds could do better in return than the official inflation rate.


16 posted on 10/26/2010 3:39:36 AM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: November 2010

The problem with these inflation protected bonds is that the seller declares what the inflation rate is. Right now they’re saying 1% but by all other yardsticks it’s around 10%. Lots of room for hanky panky there.


17 posted on 10/26/2010 8:41:07 AM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

I agree atomic_dog. Lots of posts in the last year have pointed out the problems with the government’s calculation of inflation rate. Substitution among them (oh lettuce went up in price so people will buy cabbage . . . presto no inflation . . . American cars up in price . . . betcha they’ll buy Chinese). I think that it’s so perverse that a rise in price can lead to a reduction in inflation in the correct circumstances.


18 posted on 10/26/2010 9:00:30 AM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson