Posted on 10/23/2010 10:43:37 AM PDT by smoothsailing
hardly ..that has not been true except for Cubans and Viets and others leaving oppression
put down the kool aid PJ
I have changed my tag line to PJ’s closing comment.
BTTT
It’s a good one! :o)
Ya think? I bet if you look back in the lineage of 99% of Republican voters, you’ll find a legal immigrant. Think about it! :o)
Reinforcing the fact that the Democrats remain, even today, 200 years after their founding as the Party of Slavery, the Party of Slavery.
Emphasis for your post #8. Too true. Actually the comment is a good for a tag line
___________________________________________________________
“Reinforcing the fact that the Democrats remain, even today, 200 years after their founding as the Party of Slavery, the Party of Slavery.”
__________________________________________________________
NOTICE HOW TRUE IT IS ...
One word: “TRAITORS!”
my family votes conservative. Period. Every last one of them has linage as an immigrant.
immigration has no correlation to an increase in conservatism here, in fact quite the opposite
the early 20th century urban Democrat machines were founded on the immigrant waves that clustered in the urban Northeast and in Midwest mining and manufacturing areas which in turn along with poor rural whites elsewhere and blacks gave us FDR...without those waves FDR and what he destroyed here would have been a tough sell
and now the latino and third world waves we deal with today vote overwhelmingly Democrat
the only exceptions being those fleeing Collectivism and Totalitarians...and they are the first to see that what is happening here now is just how it started from whence they fled
unfortunately these groups are a tiny percentage of the immigrant wave that has forever changed demographics here since the early 1980s
PJ is funny, means well but like most NeoCons is hopelessly naive and somewhat PC
Immigration now is a conflict of race and culture as much as anything and I see no quick fix and I sure don't see them going conservative no matter how much we pander.
It’s good to hear from PJO, he’s been somewhat absent for years. He’s getting more articles out now and showing up on TV. A great humorist going back to NatLamps glory days in the 70s.
That's because this is a nation of settlers, not "immigrants." Settlers start out as immigrants, but they stay and help to build the nation.
The leftists are trying to obfuscate the distinction between the pioneers who came to America to build homes, states, and a country with "immigrants" who come to sponge off what the pioneers built before they leave for the next place.
He’s drawn the same conclusion as me. Whenever the Dems enact some nonsense policy and you can’t figure out why, just remember: They hate your guts. Then it all makes perfect sense. Works every time.
Real Democrat Platform: THE OBJECT OF POWER
“Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The [Democrat]Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?”
—George Orwell “1984”
Definition of CANARD 1a : a false or unfounded report or story; especially : a fabricated report b : a groundless rumor or belief
Canard is a pretty strong word to be throwing around, don't you think? Certainly nothing I've posted to you merits it's use.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.