Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
As I said, you don’t need to read further than the label used; to tell what slant the article has.

It's from Xinhua, so it might just be translation. Or it might be style, "oil" is used in the sentence right before it. Or it might be intentional slant. Xinhua doesn't tend to be environmentalist in slant.

14 posted on 10/24/2010 10:15:50 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
“It's from Xinhua, so it might just be translation.”

True enough — you can't tell the original author's slant from a translation. Otherwise: “tar” = opponent; “oil” = neutral to supporter.

BTW, it would suit China's interest just fine; if the U.S. refused to take any more oil from the oil-sands. That would spur on the building of the pipeline across the Rockies to a new west-coast tanker port — whence the oil would be shipped to China.

15 posted on 10/24/2010 10:36:56 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson