I believe after raising four boys and working in the school systems that environment is mainly responsible for sexual identity. If parents belittle a child’s sex or make them feel inadequate for being a boy or girl, it will have a profound negative effect.
I would have been classified as a lesbian because I had brothers and was a major tomboy. It is normal for children to go through ages where girls love to hang out with girls and boys love to hang out with boys. Anyone who has read Freud understands the necessity for different stages for healthy sexual development.
Although Freud is wrong in certain areas, he is right about the different stages. Homosexuals know this and they want to fixate and label these kids as gay when they are normal. That is why Obama wants sex education in Kindergarten—so little kids (because they like their own sex better at these ages)—will identify themselves as gay.
Great article....these psychologist/philosophers thought sex is a social construct. I believe that natural law does have some effect, but the nature, especially boy’s, can be easily perverted because of their strong sexual drive. Boys have to be protected from homosexuals throughout development. Most serial killers are homosexual as were the Brownshirts. Charles Manson was a male prostitute as a teenager. It really is an obsessive, nihilistic, degrading, dehumanizing activity and should be treated as such.
http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/
...Other key members who join up around this time are Theodore Adorno, and, most importantly, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse. Fromm and Marcuse introduce an element which is central to Political Correctness, and that’s the sexual element. And particularly Marcuse, who in his own writings calls for a society of “polymorphous perversity,” that is his definition of the future of the world that they want to create. Marcuse in particular by the 1930s is writing some very extreme stuff on the need for sexual liberation, but this runs through the whole Institute. So do most of the themes we see in Political Correctness, again in the early 30s. In Fromm’s view, masculinity and femininity were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought. They were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.” Sex is a construct; sexual differences are a construct.
Savagesusie, if you write some of this stuff up in a vanity, I’ll ping it out.
People need to know this stuff.