Those who believe in the Big Bang theory do so on pure faith because there are no witnesses.
Those who beieve that the wonder of life and the millions of living physical living forms we see are the result of pure chemical accident take this belief on pure faith because they cannot duplicate the process in a laboratory.
Yet they belittle the faith of those who believe in God.
If there really was a Big Bang, if life really was created from dust and chemicals, how does anyone know these aren’t God’s creations or the tools God uses to create?
Either way, the believer has to have faith because there are no witnesses and no laboratory proofs.
Bunk and nonsense.
Our entire understanding of the Universe is based on scientific data accumulated over hundreds of years, at ever increasing rates, and accuracy.
The "Big Bang Theory" is only one of a number of scientific theories proposed for how the Universe began.
Another was called the "Solid State Theory".
Amongst the various theories, the Big Bang is currently most widely accepted because it best fits the scientific data available.
Over the years there have been numerous scientific challenges to the Big Bang Theory, so it has been and no doubt will continue to be modified, or even replaced, in the future.
But all of that will be based on scientific data, and the math that ties it all together -- not on blind faith.
Whose idea was GRAVITY & ELECTRICITY???
By definitionm a random process cannot
betray a logical trail.