To: MichaelNewton
She is corrrect. “Seperation of Church and State” is a product of judicial fiat.
3 posted on
10/20/2010 2:26:06 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
To: BenLurkin
And judicial fiat is a product of Article 3.
4 posted on
10/20/2010 2:28:44 PM PDT by
Huck
(Antifederalist BRUTUS should be required reading.)
To: BenLurkin
A Catholic hating Klansman no less.
5 posted on
10/20/2010 2:29:51 PM PDT by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: BenLurkin
Philip Hamburger: “Separation of Church and State” completely annihilates the idea that it was a traditional position. It was a product of Catholic bigotry, the Klan and the Progressives to create the “Separation” myth. Once it was unleashed it has taken a life of its own that is more a product of the judiciary for the last 40 years, rather than the Framers of more than 200 years.
Get the book.
7 posted on
10/20/2010 2:32:11 PM PDT by
Titus-Maximus
(Light from Light)
To: BenLurkin
“Seperation of Church and State” is a product of judicial fiat. IMHO, congress abrogated its responsibilities a long time ago by not impeaching judges over such rulings. Their failure to do so has given tacit approval for judges to improvise and contort rulings to their own personal ideology, and has given the judiciay an air of, well...unimpeachability.
8 posted on
10/20/2010 2:32:26 PM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson