He had an almost national stage at his disposal. Instead of forcefully and clearly detailing the reasons that we should make him CEO of NYS he answered every question with a re-statement of the problem rather than a detailed solution. He wasted the first 2/3 of every 60 or 90 second slot this way and then added a broad "I'll fix it" statement almost as an afterthought.
His appearance was dishevelled, his answers were disjointed and his thoughts disorganized. I wish that this were not so but it is.
I'll check off his name but it will be a vote against Cuomo and I'll be holding my nose.
If you have to mention your opinion that Paladino was “disheveled,” you must not remember *THE* Jack Kennedy, the un-metrosexual.
I heard Paladino’s very good interview with John Gambling (who is back in my good graces, for now) this morning. The podcast is online at www.wor710.com/pages/8386022.php?
Gambling agreed that the format was bad, and not much time could be given to anyone, being that there were 7 candidates. He wants to see a one on one debate between Cuomo and Paladino.
You’re so ready to give up, and I’m not.
Well you stand alone because you want a polished politician and we have a stable full of them that we’re trying to get rid of. And every article that I’ve read on the debates said it was a lousy format.