That's an interesting argument. Let's see if it's as logical as some of the arguments you've made.
They VOTED for Paladino and he won the primary
The American people voted for Barack Obama in the 2008 election and he won the presidency.
I think that was a terrible decision and that Barack Obama was a really bad choice as President.
Does that statement also show a "lack of respect for the American people"?
Or is your post just self-righteous bluster?
of course people like YOU think you know so much better then the poeple who voted for him
Neither I, nor the people who voted for him, suspected that Paladino would be as much of a disaster as he's turned out to be.
Who did you want to win, that perpetual loser Lazio?
As I've said on other threads, Lazio is a horrible candidate and he would have been guaranteed to lose to Cuomo.
Paladino was the best choice in the primary, given what we knew of him up to that point.
Since he won the primary, he has demonstrated that the GOP primary voters did not get the kind of candidate they thouight they voted for.
Now I know better. The Post has been in Cuomo's camp from day 1. And Cuomo is as liberal as his Daddy ever was.
Paladino is who they chose, the New York GOP and their “followers” just showed they are unworthy of ever holding office again. I seriously doubt if any of the people voting for Paladino will ever bother to vote for the weakkneed GOP in the future. The “just buck up and vote” crap they’ve been hearing for decades will not be answered any time in the near future.