Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Risk of Post-Election Republican Betrayal
Pajamas Media ^ | October 16, 2010 | Jeff Perren

Posted on 10/16/2010 8:36:57 AM PDT by Kaslin

What you should do about it.

Several Tea Party-favored candidates have had surprising success this primary season. Most of them have a very good chance of winning, in many cases against savvy, experienced incumbents with ties to major funding and media they can rely on for support. Overall, Republicans are poised to become a majority in the House and possibly even the Senate this November.

There’s been a sea change in the country, much quicker and more substantial than liberty lovers might have expected as recently as a year ago. Yet for some of us, it’s hard to escape a nagging question.

What happens after January when the new congressional session begins?

That feeling can seem like foolish pessimism. Things could be worse — left unreversed, current trends guarantee it. And the odds of our situation getting better next year are so good it seems ungrateful to indulge gloomy thoughts.

Still, for those who have been through this euphoria before — after Nixon’s resignation, after Reagan’s election, and after the 1994 Contract with America — the potential for disappointment does not seem small.

Even initially well-intentioned politicians make compromises, backslide, and ultimately neglect the American people.

Fortunately, that’s not inevitable. In our political system, we do often get more or less the government we ask for, where “we” is everyone but those at the two ends of the bell curve. With the shift of the electorate towards the right on that curve, things look promising this year for getting semi-decent representation.

The trick is how to keep the momentum going after January, assuming victory in November. How can we ensure that candidates who promise less spending, adherence to Constitutional limits, and relief from the perpetual tightening of the federal noose live up to their commitments once in office?

There are several ways to encourage that result.

One is to keep the pressure on — not just over the next two months, but through the next two years and indefinitely. Progressivism didn’t come to dominate the state and federal governments overnight; it was a gradual process carried out over generations by patient, dedicated destroyers. Similarly, the pro-freedom movement is not going to succeed simply because of elections in 2010, 2012, or even a decade hence.

Our situation will not improve solely via electing “the right people.”

There’s enormous pressure on politicians with even the best character to dilute their good principles. The spoils system in place makes it far too easy for even mostly honorable politicians to sell out those who elected them. Anyone who’s worked for a big company has seen that many times. Guys you’ve worked with for years who’d never think to lie, bootlick, or play politics get into management and quickly become corporate players. Men you would’ve once handed a blank check to pay for lunch soon become your biggest enemy under pressure from above.

Luckily, unlike the typical corporate setting, as a voter you don’t have to passively accept it. You’re the boss. You set the rules your employees — your representatives — have to work by, on pain of terminating their contracts. But like a good supervisor, you have to stay vigilant lest their temptation to slack off becomes overwhelming. That means continuing to blog, comment, talk to friends, stay active in local and state politics … all the things you’re doing now.

Few can afford the time, even when they have the interest, to make it a full-time avocation. But for some time to come, a heightened awareness and a degree of active participation is a must. We won’t be off the knife edge for at least two-and-a-half years. Even ten years from now, if everything goes well (and it won’t always), we’ll still be far from restoring to America the freedoms enjoyed by our great-grandparents.

Beyond staying informed and pushing for freedom, Constitutional limits, and fiscal sanity, it’ll be important to increase our own level of education.

Here, “education” means learning more — and teaching others more — about American and world history, about real-world capitalist economics, about political philosophy and related subjects. It’s worse than useless to pay attention, stay informed, and urge liberty if you don’t know how to defend your rights.

Progressives will likely suffer electoral defeat this November and in 2012, but they’re not about to give up and go away. They’ll still be a serious influence in education, media, and think tanks. George Soros, Pinch Sulzberger, and fifty more like them could disappear tomorrow and there will be a hundred standing in line to advocate statism for another generation.

The only way to keep them in check, and ultimately reduce their influence back to the tiny street corner crowds where they belong, is to keep proving them wrong to “the man in the street.” That requires having solid, sensible answers in the face of Progressive arguments cleverly designed to appear reasonable. Honing one’s knowledge on the topics above is a lifelong process and crucially important for having those answers at your fingertips whenever needed.

Two examples: everyone would profit from reading Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson (or Thomas Sowell’s Basic Economics) and Burton Folsom’s The Myth of the Robber Barons. Absorbing just those two books would arm free market advocates against the most popular Progressive distortions of history and economics.

The final suggestion here is the hardest to implement over the long haul: keep your spirits high. This struggle is bound to wear on the strongest of constitutions, but the alternative is apathy, pessimism, or cynicism — all of which destroy the country and the soul.

Said Thomas Paine in The Crisis:

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. … Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.



TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservativesvsgop; gopelites; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2010 8:37:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We can’t simply go back to sleep because the GOP is in power. We’ll need to use the whip with great gusto.


2 posted on 10/16/2010 8:38:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is the start. The 2012 primary season will be so much fun.


3 posted on 10/16/2010 8:40:51 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We need to ride them like white on rice!


4 posted on 10/16/2010 8:41:15 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
We need to stop the ghouls and vampires. We need to get their feet off our necks. We can't get at the judges, so this is going to get us a little breathing room.

Obama isn't Clinton, and so we try again. Despite the failures of the GOP in the nineties, Clinton never came after our guns again and dropped his crazy left wing stuff, adopting many of our ideas as his own. It wasn't a total failure, and those were pretty good years for most of us.

5 posted on 10/16/2010 8:44:46 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I agree 100 percent with you


6 posted on 10/16/2010 8:46:43 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776
To b e honest, I don't know what that means ride them like white on rice

An explanation would be greatly appreciated

7 posted on 10/16/2010 8:50:33 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“We can’t simply go back to sleep because the GOP is in power. We’ll need to use the whip with great gusto.”

Yes. We were complacent, and settled for platitudes and buzzwords when we should have been demanding specific legislation and specific repeals.

Never again.


8 posted on 10/16/2010 8:56:36 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We simply need to keep sending our message, and keep opposing those who don't listen to it, regardless of party. Politicians create temporary coalitions to get elected, the demands of their supporter groups are frequently contradictory and they deal with that by factoring the various groups once they get in office. If they think the group's a flash in the pan, they'll blow them off once elected. If the group gives every indication of being around long-term, and of being in no one’s pocket, it gets listened to. It's our job to make sure they know we have consistent standards, we're not going away, and we can be either their best friend or their worst enemy. Culture change takes decades, we're at year one.
9 posted on 10/16/2010 8:58:31 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

‘Risk’? Is that the new concise word for ‘certainty’?


10 posted on 10/16/2010 9:00:22 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 634 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“To be honest, I don’t know what that means ride them like white on rice

An explanation would be greatly appreciated”

Like the color white on steamed rice, be all over them, stuck to them, inseparable from them. In this context, it means zero trust and constant surveillance.


11 posted on 10/16/2010 9:01:31 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

“Culture change takes decades, we’re at year one.”

Exactly. This is a siege, not a charge.


12 posted on 10/16/2010 9:04:12 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Thanks


13 posted on 10/16/2010 9:08:16 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When the republican party has their “Robert the Bruce” moment anger will flare. People may react violently.


14 posted on 10/16/2010 9:17:30 AM PDT by yooling ( FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We have to be more vigilant because the pubbies get corrupted just a little bit at a time, while the demonRAT's, don't give a fat rat's ass, just shove it down your throat.

The pubbies always try to rationalize their betrayal, they are doing it "for our own good".

No more acceptance of BS and betrayal, if it happens, hang the Judas goats.

15 posted on 10/16/2010 9:40:01 AM PDT by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Republicans had BETTER say SCREW BIPARTISANSHIP and MEAN IT!!
16 posted on 10/16/2010 9:42:42 AM PDT by teletech (Say NO to RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
My new tagline, with a minor punctuation fix to include it, literally!
17 posted on 10/16/2010 10:01:26 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must-like men-undergo the fatigue of supporting it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yooling

Explain your thoughts on this please.


18 posted on 10/16/2010 10:02:45 AM PDT by Himyar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I say in each jurisdiction, congressional district and state, we have a credible representative of the tea party movement, someone who has helped organize and who speaks at events, who is responsible for hassling every Republican office holder, and letting them know, loudly, what they need to do, and going on all the local radio shows and writing op-eds. Dog them until they obey.


19 posted on 10/16/2010 10:34:15 AM PDT by Defiant (I'm a Fabian Constitutionalist. Roll back FDR and progressivism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This election is as Winston Churchill said after the first real victory over the Nazis at the battle of El Alamein. “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning We must continue to fight”
We must continue to fight against the liberals and progressives. They will not just give up. The power they posses is to great, the rewards too high. It took them years to get this far and they surly won’t ever give up.


20 posted on 10/16/2010 10:50:59 AM PDT by shoff (Where did that HUD money go Andy???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson