To: Jet Jaguar
2 posted on
10/15/2010 7:53:24 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: sukhoi-30mki
This is a battle between the Royal Navy, which flies Harriers,
Actually, the Royal Navy flew (past tense) Sea Harriers ... before the RAF persuaded them to give up the Sea Harriers' unique capabilities in favor of the RAF's Harrier GR.9.
Now the RAF is trying to pull the rug COMPLETELY out from underneath the RN when it comes to carrier-capable fixed wing. The Harrier GR.9s are better strike platforms (and better than nothing), but they don't in any way come near the organic counter-air capabilities that the Shar took to sea. The Brits were supposed to have learned the hard way (Falklands) the value of organic air cover. Not.
To: sukhoi-30mki
Too bad the brits cancelled the P1154 supersonic harrier project in the 1960s. They could have had their cake & eat it, too.
5 posted on
10/15/2010 8:52:58 PM PDT by
Kevmo
(So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
To: magslinger
To: sukhoi-30mki
The truth is that Britain can’t afford those carriers OR the aircraft for them.
8 posted on
10/15/2010 10:01:14 PM PDT by
DesScorp
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
9 posted on
10/16/2010 5:04:20 AM PDT by
magslinger
('This is a United States Marine Corps FA-18 fighter. Send 'em up, I'll wait!')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson