I don’t think I understand your position.
Mine is very clear:
1. Homosexuals, “out” or “closeted” do not belong in the miltary, and here are a few articles that explain why:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts
In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2608320/posts
Court Cases Reveal the Destructive Effects of Homosexual Misconduct [In the Military]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608193/posts
Homosexual Assault in the Military
2. Women should be in their own units or whatever the proper terminology is, as they used to be for instance during WW2. Then the incidence of rape or other sexual assault will be much less.
And what is your position about homosexuals in the military?
2. Women should be in their own units or whatever the proper terminology is, as they used to be for instance during WW2. Then the incidence of rape or other sexual assault will be much less.
________________________________________
They do have or used to...
Most rapes do not occur in the barracks...
I dont know of any incident that did occur there...
Maybe you are thinking of college dorms...