Posted on 10/15/2010 11:18:25 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
Executive Summary
A Family Research Council analysis of publicly available documents-the Pentagon's own report on sexual assault in the military for Fiscal Year 2009, and published decisions from military courts of appeals over the last decade and a half-have shown that there is already a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the military. This problem can only become worse if the current law is repealed and homosexuals are openly welcomed (and even granted special protections) within the military, as homosexual activists are demanding.
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
Homosexual activist groups themselves have admitted that less than three percent of Americans are homosexual or bisexual.
FRC has reviewed the "case synopses" of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009). Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. This suggests that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers.
Lack of Privacy Leads to Sexual Assaults
FRC and other supporters of the current law have pointed out the risks involved in having servicemembers share living quarters, showers, and bathrooms with persons of the same sex who may be sexually attracted to them. This concern is borne out by many of the case synopses reported by the Pentagon. The most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim. Assaults upon victims who are intoxicated are also common.
Many Discharges of Homosexuals are for Sexual Assault
Advocates of open homosexuality in the military often lament the fact that several thousand members of the military have been discharged under the 1993 law since its enactment. However, what they fail to note is that many of those discharges are actually for sexual assaults.
Court Records Reveal Shocking Cases of Homosexual Assault
Published decisions of military courts (available on the legal search engine Lexis) give even more detail about homosexual assaults in the military. For example:
Conclusion
The military already has a serious problem with sexual assault by homosexuals. If the current law against homosexuality in the military is overturned, the problem of same-sex sexual assault in the military is sure to increase.
Allowing open homosexuality in the military would do nothing to enhance the readiness or effectiveness of our armed forces. On the contrary, it would clearly damage them-in part because it would increase the already serious problem of homosexual assault in the military.
Download the full paper [PDF]
If they feel that strongly about it, they should gather together their elite shekels of silver and go buy Paraguay or something.
Poaching on the very different American ideal of the Framers should be requited with the scorn and rejection it deserves -- whether Communist poaching, homosexualist poaching, or Islamist poaching.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Excellent article and information. Anyone pushing the homosexual agenda, especially wanting homosexuals in the military - and there are number of them on FR - need to have their heads grabbed and their faces rubbed in these facts.
FYI - you might want to see this, more ammunition against “gays” in the military.
Saw it yesterday, thanks.
Funny how society never got the word on all the Nazi horridity.
Reminder to self that the Nazis were a party of the Left .....
...William Shirer describes Roehm as "a stocky, bull-necked, piggish-eyed, scar- faced professional soldier...[and] like so many of the early Nazis, a homosexual" (Shirer:64)
We need more like him in the U.S. Army?
Good quote. And explanatory of the smug reflection of a New York Times editor, on the fact that something like 3/4's of the Page One editors of The New York Times are homosexual or bisexual.
As with the SA Brown Shirts, so now, 75 years later, with "Pinchy" Sulzberger and his New York Times.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlsdwxdGa9c
Totally destroys the whole idea behind the battle, but its still kinda funny...
I should have known you’d already seen it!
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
The Pink Swastika online.
Excellent reference book for Nazi history and homosexuality. I have the first and a subsequent edition. And it’s all online. Everyone should read this book.
BUMP TO THE TOP FOR AN ABSOLUTE MUST-READ ON WHY HOMOSEXUALS IN THE MILITARY CANNOT HAPPEN!
So, Roehm was Hitler's Soros? Or his William Ayers?
The "DingDongWeiner"? "Bell to Wurst"? "Ring Around the Schnitzel"? "Belle of the Brats"?
Or what the Blank Panthers are to Obama.
BTTT.
Pinging a couple of you from that pulled thread (wish I could remember another name or two) to three older articles detailing why homos in the military is a Very Bad Thing.
Plus a good BTTT for people who have not read these articles.
Oh, you were on that thread, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.