Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dools0007world

I didn’t say it wouldn’t be better for our side.

I said (basically) I’m going to be surprised if Obama doesn’t get his way on the “big” things he wants. The Czars being one of them. A budget being another.

Obama and the left Washington is their town. They know how to get what they want. They know who on the Republican side they can talk too, bribe or threaten.

If you want to get rid of the Czars, I don’t see anything short of a law doing it. And they will need 2/3’s of both houses to override the Veto. That’s hard to do in the best of times.

(But we can defund Obama’s Czars...) We have no idea how Obama is paying his Czars to begin with - he won’t show us where the money is coming from. So good luck with that.

It’s not pessimism, because this ***is*** what is going to happen on his Czars.


25 posted on 10/14/2010 9:02:34 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Tzimisce

First, I read yesterday that conservative pubbies will challenge the Constitutionality of the czars after the mid-terms. Reason: None of them were subject to Congressional scrutiny—as Constitutionally required.

As for a law being required to kill the czars, I refer back to my comment above. We don’t need a new law. What we need is for conservative pubbies to stand up for the Constitution and initiate impeachment proceedings against the Usurping Onada. It really is that simple.


32 posted on 10/15/2010 10:42:28 AM PDT by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson