Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; Lucius Cornelius Sulla

So if Gore had refused to ask the question in 20001, GWB would have been illegally in office and the military should have disobeyed his orders?

I like you, BDZ, but you are in nutjob territory now. Deep, deep, DEEP in nutjob territory.


626 posted on 10/15/2010 6:04:32 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

If Gore had refused to ask the question somebody would have had to file a lawsuit to force him to do it. If SCOTUS refused to take up the issue the country would have been without a lawful CINC then just like we are now.

That’s why SCOTUS’ refusal to hear Kerchner’s case on the merits and resolve the issue is a danger to our national security.

I would like to believe they have a darn good reason they’ve done this, but on the other hand the only reason I can think of that would justify such a thing is if resolving the issue would CERTAINLY jeopardize the very existence of the country, because not having a lawful CINC in the middle of (at that time) two theaters of war is downright stupid if not a huge danger to national security.

To be without a valid CINC while Iran is getting nuclear weapons is a critical danger to the entire world.


632 posted on 10/15/2010 6:10:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson