Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
No, its not problematic for me. But, apparently the Shall be President part of the 12th Amendment is a big problem for you. Your arguments can only be heard in the context of an impeachment proceeding, period. And, your arguments, however intriguing they may be, are never going to trigger impeachment until evidence is produced. No one has done that yet, and until they manage to do it the government, the courts, the people in authority are going to ignore you.
604 posted on 10/15/2010 5:04:59 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316

I said:

“IOW, we know that he has not been lawfully certified as the electoral winner, and we know that he has not been lawfully certified as eligible for the office of POTUS. The entire legal procedure has been evaded.

Is that problematic for you?”

You said:

“No, its not problematic for me”

If the entire legal process being evaded is not problematic for you then I have nothing left to say to you. You are a man of lawlessness; there’s no sense trying to reason with you.

For anybody else who is following along just let me say: It cannot be known which person had the most votes if it’s never been determined whether all the votes will stand or whether they will be disqualified because of an objection. The vote count was stopped in mid-process, before any potential objections and disqualifications were addressed. There is no way to legally know what the final count ever was because the final step in the process never happened.

That’s like ending last year’s Nebraska-Texas football game without ever waiting to hear the result of the officials’ review to see whether one second needed to be put back on the clock. You’re not done if the results of a review are still pending. If you’re a Nebraskan and you celebrate winning the game when you know the play is being reviewed you’re a moron.

The country right now is still stuck in that review. People have gone on as if the outcome of the game was already known, but the refs never completed their review. They just sort of ignored that part, which was required by law in order for any next step in the process to take place.

It was as illegal as heck, which is why Kerchner filed a lawsuit against Pelosi, Cheney, etc, for their failure to obey the law and complete the necessary process before any inauguration could take place. That lawsuit has still not been resolved. The review is still underway.


610 posted on 10/15/2010 5:33:01 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson