Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
My understanding is that they are all unlawful because they are all contrary to the Constitution. They must be obeyed because of the de facto officer doctrine because superficially Obama is being accepted as POTUS.

And what clause of the Constitution pertains to filling sandbags?

Once it is known that the person doesn’t lawfully hold the position, there is a duty to disobey, correct?

Nope.

429 posted on 10/15/2010 5:44:59 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

What clause of the Constitution refers to abortion?


430 posted on 10/15/2010 6:19:12 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson