Yea Hinky, no body, only one witness. She can’t describe any of the people who shot at her or shot her husband, yes that’s hinky. It’s hinky enough to at least keep her in question to a certain extent.
Sorry until she is proven not to have done it she is as big of a suspect as anyone else, that’s how the legal system works.
it’s not hinky in the least.
You’re on jet skiis with you husband. Somebody starts shooting at you, hitting him. You try to recover him but they’re still shooting at you so you leave. What’s “hinky” about that?
Do you really believe she’d have the presence of mind under the circumstances to think clearly enough to give good descriptions of the assailants, being that the were likely some distance away and the situation was likely chaotic? Is that “hinky”?
There is one witness who states he saw her trying to elude them. Is that “hinky”?
I’m not talking about the normal investigative mode of everyone being suspect at first. I’m talking about something definite that points toward her. If you know what it is, state it outright. Don’t give me this “hinky” crap. Facts, or nothing. And if you’ve got nothing, then “hinky” doesn’t do it.
I thought you were innocent until proven guilty? When did they change it?
Blarney,
You don’t seem to trust women very much.
Any particular reason?
;-)