“Fortunately, Sarah, there should be several adequate candidates stepping forward. Carry on with your TV career.”
I’m with you, pissant. John Bolton is one that comes to mind. We know where he stands on foreign affairs.
But we also know one thing about Sarah’s view on Foreign affairs. She is all for the LOST treaty.
If you need a source of this about Sarah, I will be glad to source it for you.
John Bolton won’t be prez. He’s got a really bad mustache. Turns women off.
Go, Sarah, go!
Here's a source:
It's Bolton's comments about LOST, in 2005, when he testified at his own confirmation hearing,
BOLTON: No, I don't see that the Law of the Sea Treaty implicates the United Nations in any material respect. And those that have gone over the question of the seabed conclude there's no risk of taxation or anything like that. As I say, my own review and that of the bureaus that report to me was on the importance that our military attached to it. I will say, perhaps, one related point. A number of people have asked about the relationship of the Law of the Sea Treaty to the Proliferation Security Initiative. And you know, I don't think that if the Senate were to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty and the president were to make the treaty, that it would have any negative impact whatsoever on PSI.
He's against it now but he testified for it in 2005.
I pointed this out to you yesterday.
Do you know where Bolton stands on all the other issues? I like Bolton but he is a policy guy, not a vote getter.