Um, you think there’s evidence of “increasing complexity of life” over a period of billions of years? That may be a theory, but there’s no evidence that a genetic increase of information consistently results in more complex creatures.
If you’re sincerely interested in understanding the creationist perspective, I challenge you to ponder this entire article:
http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-2-variation-and-natural-selection-versus-evolution
Consider, especially, the “orchard model” described later on that page. The physical evidence is consistent with this orchard model of creation.
Just an aside: Do you believe in God? If not, then of course you’ve selected a model that excludes God.
It is not a theory that the evidence exists. The fossil record exists. It is tangible. Whether there is "genetic increase of ininformation" is speculation, but the evidence of increasing complexity is not.
Just an aside: Do you believe in God? If not, then of course you’ve selected a model that excludes God.
Why does a model that permits evolution have to exclude God?