Posted on 10/11/2010 10:56:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
California has 12% of America’s population. The results of the upcoming election will determine the future not only of the state, but likely the nation as well. The race for governor, between Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown, could not be more meaningful or illustrate a larger study in contrasts. Most people believe that Carly Fiorina’s attempt to unseat far-left Senator Barbara Boxer is the second most important election, but in fact, it’s not. The race for State Controller, the state’s chief financial officer, will be the key to success for Whitman when she becomes our Governor. In 2006, John Chiang won the State Controller’s office over Republican Tony Strickland, even though internal polling indicated that Strickland led the race until the last weekend. The state public employee unions recognized that Phil Angelides had no chance against Schwarzenegger, so they targeted their efforts and millions of dollars against Strickland. Arnold, who knew he was swamping Angelides, made virtually no effort to help his down-ballot slate and ended up with a Controller and Attorney General of the opposing party.
Chiang has repaid the unions many times over, and has made Arnold regret his shortsighted neglect. No one has been a bigger thorn in the side of the Terminator than Chiang, who has dutifully kowtowed to the public employee unions to the detriment not only of Arnold, but more significantly the taxpayers of California. Chiang is a former IRS staffer who has also been the enemy of California businesses in his role as a member of the State Board of Equalization, as well as the nemesis of working Californians as the overseer of the Franchise Tax Board (which is responsible for collection of income taxes). Rarely does he rule in favor of the taxpayer.
For four years, Whitman watched the battles between Arnold and Chiang and Jerry Brown, the Attorney General. She decided that she needed a dedicated team to confront the major challenges facing California, and with this objective approached the highly respected Strickland and asked him to make a second run. Initially, Strickland was very reluctant. He had just won a State Senate seat and questioned the wisdom and the draining effort of opting out so quickly to run a statewide race. But Whitman, along with many of his most loyal supporters, convinced him that he was much more valuable to California as the State Controller than he was as a senator. He signed on and he is now a happy man. The forty-year old, 6’ 4” Strickland, married with two young children, had no problems getting the support of his wife, Audra. She is herself a member of the California State Assembly and as familiar as her husband with the fiscal challenges facing the state. She has seen the cost of government soar during her six years in Sacramento with very little ability to stop the disaster as there are not enough Assembly Republicans to thwart the Democratic onslaught. They have to rely on a slim margin in the State Senate to do that.
Strickland understands very well the importance of his election, not only to work closely with Whitman, but also to dig into the details of the economic travesty that California has become.
For example, national exposure of the preposterous salaries in the City of Bell drew attention to the issue of excessive pension and healthcare benefits for public employees. Yet Chiang, as CFO of the State and a member of the CalPERS (the pension board overseeing the Bell employees), knew about the ridiculous salaries four years ago and sat on his hands in his role as chief protector of the unions who paid his way into office.
Reversing the unsustainable pension costs is one of many jobs to be done once Strickland becomes Controller. California’s silly rules that allow unused vacation pay and sick leave, accumulated over several years, to inflate the final-year salary that forms the basis for pension calculations, must be reformed to bring the budget into line. Strickland told me he does not understand why state employees earn accumulated vacation or sick leave at all. He pointed out that it is a basic rule of private industry that employees must use their vacation and sick leave or lose it. This principle is required by CPA’s who audit companies in order to prevent fraud and collusion, and Strickland doesn’t understand why the same principle shouldn’t apply to public employees as well.
If Chiang retains his seat, Whitman will be stymied in her efforts to make the changes necessary to return economic sanity to California. No other state is less business-friendly than California, yet Chiang doesn’t seem to understand that his lockstep allegiance to the unions and his anti-taxpayer behavior is a large part of the problem. Strickland’s election is critical not only for California, but for an economic turnaround throughout America. He understands the stakes involved in this election and relishes the chance to be part of the team that brings California back to its “golden” days. November 2nd cannot come soon enough.
California is most worrisome. The state is a complete basketcase yet Jerry Brown is not only competitive but leading in most polls?
What is it going to take for Californians to open their eyes? I am not even convinced complete default would do it. These people seem so wedded to the social welfare state that virtually nothing will get through to them.
The choice is between radical Socialism and sell out Socialism. CA is doomed. History says so.
Agree about Strickland, but disagree about Whitman. Meg is a worse RINO than any thing we’ve seen. At least the Maine sisters, McCain and Graham have actually voted for GOP candidates for the last 20 years.
She’s for AB32, against Prop 23, praised Van Jones, is pro-choice, flipped flopped brazenly on immigration and may have cut a deal with the police unions to save their inflated pensions.
She’s also Romney’s henchman.
“between Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown, could not be more meaningful or illustrate a larger study in contrasts.”
BS. We have a choice between Moonbeam or I’ll Be Back II
“What is it going to take for Californians to open their eyes? I am not even convinced complete default would do it. These people seem so wedded to the social welfare state that virtually nothing will get through to them.’
As I see it it’s the damned media again as the #1 ally to the Leftists. Brown is running his typical nasty campaign, and has back to back ads running almost constantly against Whitman.
Anything NOT of Leftist approval gets trounced in the media out here. It’s a battle for anyone to get around the force of the Leftist media.
It’s easy for the Left, the media, as California is an urban State. Control is easy. There’s not enough of us out in the sticks to make up for the controlled in the fish tanks.
Yeah, it will take “complete default”, and then some.
Yeah, I agree. The mainstream media is the Democrats chief propaganda arm. And the scary thing is, even with the rise of the new media (including some balanced and even conservative leaning media outlets), look where we are. We have the most radical left President ever, and a more leftist House and Senate than at any time in US history to match. This I attribute to a drumbeat of liberalism from the mainstream media for so many years that even now that they are losing their monopoly on thought, reversing the damage may take generations. Belief in big government has just taken hold so strongly - particularly amongst minority and victim groups, that nearly half our population have become a giant dependent class. Socialism is like heroin to the masses, once the addiction takes hold it is near impossible to root it out.
Well, to digress a little, I think the most important race is for Senator, because that affects our whole country. Governor and Controller just mean that California wrecks itself.
That’s not good, for the country as a whole as well as the State of California. But getting Barbara Boxer out of the Senate is much more important.
I have voted enthusiastically for Tony Strickland in the past and will vote less enthusiastically for him in this election.
Hitching his wagon to Whitman was NOT a positive move.
Tony Strickland would have a hard time making it in the private sector.
How can you say she is a RINO? What political office has she held. Also a RINO is someone that votes mostly with the democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.