Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Siemens Wins Battle of Fast Trains [Eurostar buys German, French p*ssed]
The New York Times ^ | October 7, 2010 | David Jolly

Posted on 10/11/2010 7:26:45 AM PDT by wolf78

PARIS — In an effort to prepare for competition on cross-Channel rail traffic, Eurostar said Thursday that it had awarded a hotly sought contract to upgrade its aging fleet of fast trains to a Germany company, Siemens.

The announcement did not sit well in Paris, which had been backing a French champion, and officials sharply criticized the decision.

The £700 million, or $1.1 billion, contract will provide Eurostar — which is majority owned by the French state through its ownership of the national railway S.N.C.F. — with 10 of Siemens’ sleek new Velaro e320 trains. Siemens beat out the A.G.V. trains made by Alstom, the French industrial conglomerate. Designed by the Italian firm Pininfarina, the trains will be capable of traveling on other networks, as Eurostar seeks to extend its own reach into Germany and the Netherlands.

The Eurostar e320, as it is known, will carry more than 900 passengers at a top speed of 320 kilometers, or 200 miles, per hour, compared with the 750 passengers the current generation carries, at speeds of up to 300 kilometers per hour, Eurostar said. It will also have onboard WiFi and entertainment systems. The company hopes the new fleet will better position it for the arrival of Deutsche Bahn, the German operator that hopes to start offering service from points in Germany to London by the end of 2013, when Eurostar’s monopoly ends.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bullettrain; chunnel; eurostar; france; germany; rail; siemens; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last


The Eurostar e320 Train is based on the Siemens Velaro platform (Velaro D).

BTW, you know that the French concerns are pure bullsh*t when the train Alstom offered, the AGV, also uses distributed traction. Either there are safety concerns for both or both trains are OK. Which they are. Actually distributed traction is better because you won't have passengers stranded because of heavy snowfall like last year.
1 posted on 10/11/2010 7:26:49 AM PDT by wolf78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wolf78
$1.1 billion, contract will provide Eurostar

I wonder what the ticket price would have to be to cover the entire unsubsidized cost of a ride on this taxpayer fleecing boondoggle.

2 posted on 10/11/2010 7:41:02 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
I wonder what the ticket price would have to be to cover the entire unsubsidized cost of a ride on this taxpayer fleecing boondoggle.

In the case of the channel tunnel I actually don't know the exact economics. Because of the well-suited distances rail operators are profitable in Europe. That doesn't mean it's the same in Kansas.


3 posted on 10/11/2010 7:53:56 AM PDT by wolf78 (Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolf78
Because of the well-suited distances rail operators are profitable in Europe

I disagree. European rail services are very heavily subsidized. They might possibly pe profitable without the subsidy, but they're propped up two ways. First direct subsidy, and second indirect subsidy by massively taxing anything to do with automobile transport thus shifting an artificial economic advantage to rail.

4 posted on 10/11/2010 8:02:41 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

They’ve been trying to fund a demo of a dedicated service on existing rail between Ann Arbor and Detroit for a while now. So far they’ve failed to fund that and the cost per rider is expected to be some $70 per ticket.

20 minutes by train for $70 vs 30 to 40 minutes by car for $10. Hmmmmmm


5 posted on 10/11/2010 8:18:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Certainly they are - but so are streets and other infrastructures for cars.

Long distance Rail is unbeatable for business travel - I would never go major city / major city in europe by car - I could aswell read a book or work if necessary - why loose important time of your live behind the weel ?

Check in times of airports are such that you can forget to be faster by plane if it’s not 1000km distance if you don’t have to go southern germany (bad rail connections).

In this case you even safe boarding a ship and slowly pass the channel - although I miss the Hover Craft - it was a great experience and very fast but unreliable.

Going to London from most parts of germany and france other then by train just isn’t the thing - cars dont work in London - Planes don’t work in England (Luggage in Basra - man in Bristol - terminal five and all that).

For London there’s only train and tube (appart from bicycle - but that’s for people who go fast and want to die)


6 posted on 10/11/2010 8:19:13 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wolf78
Because of the well-suited distances rail operators are profitable in Europe. That doesn't mean it's the same in Kansas.

The proposed north/south Wichita – Oklahoma City– Fort Worth route would not only benefit Kansans, but also provide much needed rail network connectivity between Amrak's east/west "Southwest Chief" and "Texas Eagle" routes.

IMHO, Amtrak could probably use a few more north/south connectors between the east/west routes in the western states. It could really make passenger rail travel much more viable in the western states.

7 posted on 10/11/2010 8:19:38 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wolf78

Hope they’re an improvement, because the current trains suck. This summer, we were hours late due to an earlier breakdown. Also, Eurostar waiting areas and boarding are a zoo.


8 posted on 10/11/2010 8:22:19 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf78

Why not? Siemens software is the best for Iranian Nuclear bomb plants. They’ll do wonders for real fast Trains!


9 posted on 10/11/2010 8:30:17 AM PDT by SanFranDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
Certainly they are - but so are streets and other infrastructures for cars.

For that to be equivalent there would have to be an equal dollar amount subsidy on a per passenger mile traveled, and I once read that the subsidy for rail in Europe is much higher than the amount allocated for auto travel. I can't find a reference though. I'd like to know the actual figures.

10 posted on 10/11/2010 8:37:48 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wolf78

Whoa! That is so cool looking and German that I almost would drink Willie Greens High Speed and Light Rail kool aide.

By the second week in the USA it would look like a typical Amtrak filthy, graffitti covered, POS wreck.


11 posted on 10/11/2010 8:43:07 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Isn’t Ann Arbor very liberal and white while Detroit is very liberal and black?

I say I am all for this train with free passes for poor Detroit residents.


12 posted on 10/11/2010 8:45:07 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

The money would be better spent on a wall around Ann Arbor, Yipsilanti, and Detroit.


13 posted on 10/11/2010 8:47:11 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

“Designed by the Italian firm Pininfarina.”

No wonder it looks so damn good. Sweet.


14 posted on 10/11/2010 8:50:49 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
"I disagree. European rail services are very heavily subsidized.

No doubt.

Nearly all transportation is government subsidized, on a global basis.
15 posted on 10/11/2010 9:37:02 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

16 posted on 10/11/2010 9:38:52 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

In the end the only question is - is it economically efficient ?

By that means and if one is tending to base on a model where resources are a much better indicator for value these days then paper money - the best means of transportation using the least resources to get you from a to b - also regarding infrastructure maintenance etc - is a fully loaded bus with a diesel engine...

...the worst is a nearly empty bus with whatever engine.

Rails are great because you don’t have to drive and even if it’s not allways full till under the roof it’s still not a complete failure economically - and in the end it doesn’t matter much if you gave your money to a states paied cashier in germany (not corrupt at all) to contract a fair enterprise (corrupt but still productive) or if you paid directly to one of these monopolistic enterprises where only guys like warren buffet have a say (more corrupt) - it’s either way corrupt but somehow maybe not yet enough to make it hopeless.


17 posted on 10/11/2010 9:44:08 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“Thunderbirds are go!”

Awesome. Way ahead of it’s time. I wonder who designed that? Wow - it is not filthy and filled with grafitti like all Amtrak trains.


18 posted on 10/11/2010 9:50:06 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
I disagree. European rail services are very heavily subsidized. They might possibly pe profitable without the subsidy, but they're propped up two ways. First direct subsidy, and second indirect subsidy by massively taxing anything to do with automobile transport thus shifting an artificial economic advantage to rail.

To some extent true. But on the other hand, if it weren't for post-9/11 socialism, there wouldn't be an aviation industry in the US any more. With transit it's always hard to find a truly free-market competitor. Taxing oil has also something to do with Europe historically having very little of it. That's one of the reasons why e.g. in Germany gas taxes are extremely high, but corporate taxes are much lower than in the US.

Those are not excuses. Just context.
19 posted on 10/11/2010 10:02:49 AM PDT by wolf78 (Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
"I wonder who designed that?"

Most likely the GM Design Center.

It was a prototype (1 of 2) built LONG before Amtrak.

20 posted on 10/11/2010 10:05:50 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson