[Dr. Scarpetta]

But what is the point to going on her show and defeating her as if the audience for that show can be reasoned with?

I agree.

I know a woman who watches MSNBC, and you can't talk to her. She hates Fox News because Olberman does. She recently told me she loves algore. It's like banging your head against a wall trying to reason with a liberal.

[Eldon Tyrell]

It is scary, isn’t it?

I think PMSNBC just wants to capture their nitch - far left idiots. But it is surprising when you hear someone say something like”Rachel maddow investigated that. if it weren’t for her hard work, ...” -

[Enchante]

oh, I just watched this thing -— he was great

but how anyone can bear to watch Rachel Madcow, EVER, is one of the great mysteries of the universe

here she does a nightly agitprop shtick on behalf of the Demagogues, effectively representing many millions of dollars (over time) of free “advertising” for them, and she has the gall to flog him over some private issue group

the left is really in a panic about Nov. - it’s fun to see them squirm

[MrB]

All you need to understand about your average lib, especially the female variety, and especially especially the single female variety,

is that they are libs simply in order to feel good about themselves as “a good person”, without going to the only route through which guilt can truly be relieved - repentance and asking for forgiveness.

[Marylander]

You can't argue with them because their connection is not rational, but emotional.

What would change their emotional connection? When they see a direct connection between government action and something to their personal detriment. Maybe. Overexposure to their heroes? Maybe. Conflict between equally-loved heroes? Maybe. Rational argument? Never. If you want to change something, use the appropriate tool.

[sport]

You need to seek different company.